Sinisterly
SE Phone - Printable Version

+- Sinisterly (https://sinister.li)
+-- Forum: Hacking (https://sinister.li/Forum-Hacking)
+--- Forum: Social Engineering (https://sinister.li/Forum-Social-Engineering)
+--- Thread: SE Phone (/Thread-SE-Phone)

Pages: 1 2

SE Phone - Jaccmcmcnn - 07-14-2023

I ordered a phone from apple and am trying to do eb, they have told me the investigation will take weeks, and that I will need to sign a stat dec, the only issue is that their return policy is only 15 days. So is it still possible to attempt this SE, and being able to return if it fails?

RE: SE Phone - mothered - 07-14-2023

Quote:I ordered a phone from a retailer and am trying to do eb, they have told me the investigation will take weeks
Too heavy to EB It.

Hopefully the weight will not be cross-checked.

Quote:the only issue is that their return policy is only 21 days. So is it still possible to attempt this SE, and being able to return if it fails?
Which company?

RE: SE Phone - Jaccmcmcnn - 07-14-2023

(07-14-2023, 10:07 AM)mothered Wrote:
Quote:I ordered a phone from a retailer and am trying to do eb, they have told me the investigation will take weeks
Too heavy to EB It.

Hopefully the weight will not be cross-checked.

Quote:the only issue is that their return policy is only 21 days. So is it still possible to attempt this SE, and being able to return if it fails?
Which company?


apple, heard of some recent success with eb. They have already cross-checked the weight, and are assuming that its theft, or me, hence the stat dec and pr

RE: SE Phone - mothered - 07-15-2023

(07-14-2023, 01:12 PM)Jaccmcmcnn Wrote: apple, heard of some recent success with eb. They have already cross-checked the weight, and are assuming that its theft, or me, hence the stat dec and pr
Did you comply with the PR and stat dec?

RE: SE Phone - Jaccmcmcnn - 07-15-2023

(07-15-2023, 09:36 AM)mothered Wrote:
(07-14-2023, 01:12 PM)Jaccmcmcnn Wrote: apple, heard of some recent success with eb. They have already cross-checked the weight, and are assuming that its theft, or me, hence the stat dec and pr
Did you comply with the PR and stat dec?

No, not yet, not sure I want to sign the stat dec if it might not even result in a refund.

RE: SE Phone - Wreck_C - 07-15-2023

If Apple is requesting a PR then forget it. They will not refund you even after the PR. This usually means your address have hit them before or apple id and have gotten a reimbursement already.

The quick investigation apples does is to find previous abuses. They never actually investigate with courier or open claims. Otherwise they will only go as far as ask for photos from you.

RE: SE Phone - Jaccmcmcnn - 07-15-2023

(07-15-2023, 02:28 PM)cookz028lulz Wrote: If Apple is requesting a PR then forget it. They will not refund you even after the PR. This usually means your address have hit them before or apple id and have gotten a reimbursement already.

The quick investigation apples does is to find previous abuses. They never actually investigate with courier or open claims. Otherwise they will only go as far as ask for photos from you.

ive literally never touched them before

RE: SE Phone - dohali8720 - 07-15-2023

(07-15-2023, 02:28 PM)cookz028lulz Wrote: If Apple is requesting a PR then forget it. They will not refund you even after the PR. This usually means your address have hit them before or apple id and have gotten a reimbursement already.

The quick investigation apples does is to find previous abuses. They never actually investigate with courier or open claims. Otherwise they will only go as far as ask for photos from you.
would it work for Macbook DNA too? aged account with no se before

RE: SE Phone - mothered - 07-16-2023

(07-15-2023, 12:17 PM)Jaccmcmcnn Wrote: No, not yet, not sure I want to sign the stat dec if it might not even result in a refund.
A stat dec per se Is not legally binding, so there's nothing to lose and everything to gain - should the SE work In your favour.

It's your call.

RE: SE Phone - Jaccmcmcnn - 07-16-2023

(07-16-2023, 09:26 AM)mothered Wrote:
(07-15-2023, 12:17 PM)Jaccmcmcnn Wrote: No, not yet, not sure I want to sign the stat dec if it might not even result in a refund.
A stat dec per se Is not legally binding, so there's nothing to lose and everything to gain - should the SE work In your favour.

It's your call.

Im reading about, and seen that the stat dec is infact legally binding. How do i find that its not legally binding?