![]() |
|
Samsung method - Printable Version +- Sinisterly (https://sinister.li) +-- Forum: Hacking (https://sinister.li/Forum-Hacking) +--- Forum: Social Engineering (https://sinister.li/Forum-Social-Engineering) +--- Thread: Samsung method (/Thread-Samsung-method) |
Samsung method - papken - 03-02-2023 Hey, do any of you know the method for samsung that refunders are overspamming about recently? RE: Samsung method - Needsepeople - 03-03-2023 Fake PR ![]() 25 chars thing. RE: Samsung method - mothered - 03-03-2023 (03-03-2023, 01:22 AM)Needsepeople Wrote: Fake PRAnd It's never cross-checked? RE: Samsung method - papken - 03-03-2023 (03-03-2023, 01:22 AM)Needsepeople Wrote: Fake PR What do you mean by "25 chars thing"? RE: Samsung method - EquitableEngineer - 03-03-2023 (03-03-2023, 01:22 AM)Needsepeople Wrote: Fake PRInteresting RE: Samsung method - tbfk - 03-03-2023 yeah i heard it is fake PR.i was actually thinking about doing it but with my luck it will be patched right when i will start it, so i think i will pass RE: Samsung method - papken - 03-03-2023 (03-03-2023, 07:36 AM)tbfk Wrote: yeah i heard it is fake PR.i was actually thinking about doing it but with my luck it will be patched right when i will start it, so i think i will pass it's not safe to play with fake pr, not worth imo. RE: Samsung method - Paid2330 - 03-17-2023 I recently done a SE on samsung for around 1kish and i might have been able to bypass the PR requirement with the corrupted file method. Will update the thread once the refund actually posts to my account. RE: Samsung method - ikang2008 - 03-18-2023 (03-17-2023, 11:10 PM)Paid2330 Wrote: I recently done a SE on samsung for around 1kish and i might have been able to bypass the PR requirement with the corrupted file method. Will update the thread once the refund actually posts to my account.Waiting for update |