+- Sinisterly (https://sinister.li)
+-- Forum: Hacking (https://sinister.li/Forum-Hacking)
+--- Forum: Social Engineering (https://sinister.li/Forum-Social-Engineering)
+--- Thread: Energy drink powder - better to DNA or claim spoiled? (/Thread-Energy-drink-powder-better-to-DNA-or-claim-spoiled)
Energy drink powder - better to DNA or claim spoiled? - Seeeeee - 06-01-2022
Wanting to hit up an energy drink supplement SE. They deliver with UPS, no signature required. Seems ideal for a DNA, but they claim having no responsibility of the package if it's lost or doesn't arrive. Is a DNA still wise, or should I claim it was spoiled or spilled instead? Keeping the name of the brand out of it until the SE is complete.
RE: Energy drink powder - better to DNA or claim spoiled? - isaacnnn - 06-01-2022
(06-01-2022, 01:26 PM)Seeeeee Wrote: Wanting to hit up an energy drink supplement SE. They deliver with UPS, no signature required. Seems ideal for a DNA, but they claim having no responsibility of the package if it's lost or doesn't arrive. Is a DNA still wise, or should I claim it was spoiled or spilled instead? Keeping the name of the brand out of it until the SE is complete.
I would assume it would be impossible to DNA in any way given that policy.
I would go with a broken seal and an off taste/smell leading to a safety issue with consumption. Something believable and along them lines.
RE: Energy drink powder - better to DNA or claim spoiled? - mothered - 06-01-2022
Quote:should I claim it was spoiled or spilled instead?^ This.
Alternatively, go with @isaacnnn's advice above pertaining to consumption.