![]() |
|
FTID warning - Printable Version +- Sinisterly (https://sinister.li) +-- Forum: Hacking (https://sinister.li/Forum-Hacking) +--- Forum: Social Engineering (https://sinister.li/Forum-Social-Engineering) +--- Thread: FTID warning (/Thread-FTID-warning) Pages:
1
2
|
FTID warning - Itsit - 05-02-2022 Just a warning thread regarding people doing FTID. In a FTID telegram i am part of UK members doing FTID on Adidas are receiving letters from Debt collectors regarding parcels not being returned so money is owed. Just a heads up to keep in mind. RE: FTID warning - Mark0thepolo - 05-02-2022 Interesting. I have always been surprised that more retailers don't do this. Thanks for the information. RE: FTID warning - johnnyboiog88 - 05-02-2022 Have also seen posts from people that have actually returned items getting the same letters so I am not entirely sure what mess Adidas have done to be honest. RE: FTID warning - mothered - 05-02-2022 Yet another reason to not use the so-called flawed FTID garbage. RE: FTID warning - Itsit - 05-02-2022 (05-02-2022, 02:07 AM)mothered Wrote: Yet another reason to not use the so-called flawed FTID garbage. My first thought that came to mind was that you are not favourable with this method. Who knows maybe one day all FTIDs may catch up somehow. RE: FTID warning - mothered - 05-02-2022 (05-02-2022, 02:30 AM)Itsit Wrote: My first thought that came to mind was that you are not favourable with this method.And this clearly justifies my view on the piece of trash. RE: FTID warning - Mark0thepolo - 05-03-2022 (05-02-2022, 02:46 AM)mothered Wrote:(05-02-2022, 02:30 AM)Itsit Wrote: My first thought that came to mind was that you are not favourable with this method.And this clearly justifies my view on the piece of trash. I can understand criticism, but I feel like you need to justify your extreme opinion on FTID more. I have seen so many people pull it off successfully for extreme amounts of money with very good rates of success. No method is perfect. RE: FTID warning - nunchi - 05-03-2022 (05-03-2022, 12:23 AM)Mark0thepolo Wrote:(05-02-2022, 02:46 AM)mothered Wrote:(05-02-2022, 02:30 AM)Itsit Wrote: My first thought that came to mind was that you are not favourable with this method.And this clearly justifies my view on the piece of trash. He refuses to accept that FTID has been the most successful method for a while now (besides UPS API atm) idk why lmao. No method is perfect, especially EB and DNA. To add more context onto the original post, literally EVERYONE got a letter. Even innocent people who returned items legitimately, the debt collecting agency is getting nuked with bad reviews, I wouldn't stress over it. They can't do shit. RE: FTID warning - mothered - 05-03-2022 (05-03-2022, 12:23 AM)Mark0thepolo Wrote: I can understand criticism, but I feel like you need to justify your extreme opinion on FTID more.It's not my opinion, but rather a fact from a warehouse, logistics and freight distribution standpoint. Refer to the articles on my blog - they justify It In every facet. (05-03-2022, 03:16 AM)nunchi Wrote: He refuses to accept that FTID has been the most successful method for a while nowGood joke. It's successful against selected/limited companies whose carriers, employees (and whoever Is handling the return/claim), fail to use logic and totally mismanage the claim's process. I can name 10 companies, and I can assure you without a shadow of a doubt, that It will fail on each and every occasion. Every traditional method Is designed and formulated to work against every company, as opposed to the flawed FTID that targets specific entities and relies on the Incompetence, laziness, stupidity and lack of common sense of Its personnel for the method (If you can call It that) to succeed. The so-called FTID Is not responsible for a favorable outcome - It's the brain-dead Individuals that allow It to succeed. RE: FTID warning - Andrea Bags - 05-03-2022 (05-03-2022, 03:16 AM)nunchi Wrote:don't understand the ups API stuff(05-03-2022, 12:23 AM)Mark0thepolo Wrote:(05-02-2022, 02:46 AM)mothered Wrote: And this clearly justifies my view on the piece of trash. |