Sinisterly
wanting to SE again - Printable Version

+- Sinisterly (https://sinister.li)
+-- Forum: Hacking (https://sinister.li/Forum-Hacking)
+--- Forum: Social Engineering (https://sinister.li/Forum-Social-Engineering)
+--- Thread: wanting to SE again (/Thread-wanting-to-SE-again)

Pages: 1 2

wanting to SE again - 11gee11 - 04-08-2021

I've been out of the the game for a little while but w covid it's been too easy to SE companies. Are there any new methods that have come about in the past year. did not arrive seems to continue to be useful and even when companies have "proof" (like pics of the delivery), it's still easy to claim something didn't arrive. I guess what I"m asking,is if there are any more "exciting' methods if that makes sense.

RE: wanting to SE again - mothered - 04-08-2021

Quote:Are there any new methods that have come about in the past year.
what I"m asking,is if there are any more "exciting' methods if that makes sense.
Please name the methods you've been using, and we can establish whether there are any unbeknownst to you.

RE: wanting to SE again - 11gee11 - 04-08-2021

(04-08-2021, 04:22 PM)mothered Wrote:
Quote:Are there any new methods that have come about in the past year.
what I"m asking,is if there are any more "exciting' methods if that makes sense.
Please name the methods you've been using, and we can establish whether there are any unbeknownst to you.

Did not arrive, like I mentioned. I also know of fake tracking number, though I don't think I've ever used it.

Claiming an item was damaged and receiving a refund.

Claiming an item was lost in transit

I've though about calling to reroute a package (to a known and accessible location to me) while it was in transit and claiming that I neer authorized the reroute? have you used a method like that before?

RE: wanting to SE again - mothered - 04-09-2021

(04-08-2021, 06:16 PM)11gee11 Wrote: Did not arrive, like I mentioned. I also know of fake tracking number, though I don't think I've ever used it.

Claiming an item was damaged and receiving a refund.

Claiming an item was lost in transit
Thanks for that.

There's a lot more methods, that Include (but not limited to):
  • Sealed Box
  • Missing Item/partial
  • Gift method
  • Blood method
  • Faulty Item method
  • Wrong Item received
  • Serial number method
  • Leaking battery method
  • Broken glass method
  • FTID method (biggest load of trash to hit the SEing sector)
  • Boxing method
  • Stale food method
  • Corrupted video/file method
  • Disposed of the faulty Item

And the list goes on.

(04-08-2021, 06:16 PM)11gee11 Wrote: I've though about calling to reroute a package (to a known and accessible location to me) while it was in transit and claiming that I neer authorized the reroute?
Who will you Identify yourself as when calling, and what reason(s) will you give to reroute It?

RE: wanting to SE again - 11gee11 - 04-15-2021

Wow thank you for this. I was planning on saying that an unauthorized caller made the change.

What's wrong with FTID?

RE: wanting to SE again - onlineLorde - 04-15-2021

SEings is limited to us or other countries also work smoothly?

RE: wanting to SE again - mothered - 04-16-2021

(04-15-2021, 05:35 PM)11gee11 Wrote: I was planning on saying that an unauthorized caller made the change.
Good move.

Coincidentally, I did the very same thing with a local carrier In my locality just the other week, and It was very simple to manipulate the agent. Hardly any personal details were required to reroute the package to an address of my choice.

(04-15-2021, 05:35 PM)11gee11 Wrote: What's wrong with FTID?
Checkout the article In my blog.

Though, I have written one method that may work.

RE: wanting to SE again - 11gee11 - 04-16-2021

Alright cool, thanks. I'll check this out.

RE: wanting to SE again - scoobyeo - 06-01-2021

(04-16-2021, 04:28 AM)mothered Wrote:
(04-15-2021, 05:35 PM)11gee11 Wrote: I was planning on saying that an unauthorized caller made the change.
Good move.

Coincidentally, I did the very same thing with a local carrier In my locality just the other week, and It was very simple to manipulate the agent. Hardly any personal details were required to reroute the package to an address of my choice.








(04-15-2021, 05:35 PM)11gee11 Wrote: What's wrong with FTID?
Checkout the article In my blog.

Though, I have written one method that may work.

I disagree FTID has by far been the most efficient and fastest method ive ever used. 100% success rate if done right

RE: wanting to SE again - mothered - 06-01-2021

(06-01-2021, 06:17 AM)scoobyeo Wrote: I disagree FTID has by far been the most efficient and fastest method ive ever used. 100% success rate if done right
Any method can work If the reps/carriers are half-asleep on the job, or PayPal simply approves refunds purely based on tracking shown as "being delivered".

No method has a 100% success rate, and the flawed so-called FTID Is certainly part of the equation. In my line of work, namely the company I'm employed with, the FTID "will fail each and every time". There's no Ifs, ands, or buts about It.