![]() |
|
Whatsapp privacy taking steps back now. - Printable Version +- Sinisterly (https://sinister.li) +-- Forum: General (https://sinister.li/Forum-General) +--- Forum: The Lounge (https://sinister.li/Forum-The-Lounge) +--- Thread: Whatsapp privacy taking steps back now. (/Thread-Whatsapp-privacy-taking-steps-back-now) Pages:
1
2
|
Whatsapp privacy taking steps back now. - fsociety - 01-17-2021 Now look how they change there words..everyone is getting whatsapp story status on there whatsapp now.
RE: Whatsapp privacy taking steps back now. - mothered - 01-18-2021 Quote:Now look how they change there wordsAre you saying that everything (as per the Image) has been changed? RE: Whatsapp privacy taking steps back now. - fsociety - 01-18-2021 (01-18-2021, 03:23 AM)mothered Wrote:Quote:Now look how they change there wordsAre you saying that everything (as per the Image) has been changed? yeah suddenly there words get changed , recently everyone is seeing there story in whatsapp .
RE: Whatsapp privacy taking steps back now. - Green314 - 01-18-2021 WhatsApp < Telegram < Signal < Carrier pigeon. RE: Whatsapp privacy taking steps back now. - mothered - 01-18-2021 (01-18-2021, 10:31 AM)fsociety Wrote: yeah suddenly there words get changed , recently everyone is seeing there story in whatsapp .It'll be Interesting to see exactly how It was worded prior to the change. RE: Whatsapp privacy taking steps back now. - Zrek721 - 02-05-2021 Whatsapp is a whale when it comes to privacy scam. Cannot trust whatsapp/facebook RE: Whatsapp privacy taking steps back now. - docvd - 02-12-2021 Just go for Signal. Whatsapp is a total data krake. RE: Whatsapp privacy taking steps back now. - Drako - 02-12-2021 Moral of the story; if it's owned by Facebook, don't use it. RE: Whatsapp privacy taking steps back now. - ecstasy. - 02-15-2021 (02-12-2021, 04:11 AM)Drako Wrote: Moral of the story; if it's owned by Facebook, don't use it. Yes... but actually no. It depends on the purpose of the company/product owned by them. RE: Whatsapp privacy taking steps back now. - Drako - 02-16-2021 (02-15-2021, 11:11 PM)ecstasy. Wrote: Yes... but actually no. It depends on the purpose of the company/product owned by them. When it comes to companies with morals like Facebook, that sort of thinking would be incorrect. If you have a program or app that's been released for free by a company with potentially thousands of employees that are all on payroll, that creates a need for funds; obviously. The only two ways to make money would be by restricting features unless the user pays a set amount of money, or you mine data from the users phone and then sell that data. That's the only way executives are going to be able to turn a profit. And the purpose of the app/program has no effect on the capabilities of the code behind it. RAM cleaners, weather apps, gacha games, and social media apps could all easily have the exact same function that sends data to a server. Closed source code creates an easy gateway for businesses to sneak in nefarious bits of code that could be doing anything. |