![]() |
|
How can I SE Clothing Stores? - Printable Version +- Sinisterly (https://sinister.li) +-- Forum: Hacking (https://sinister.li/Forum-Hacking) +--- Forum: Social Engineering (https://sinister.li/Forum-Social-Engineering) +--- Thread: How can I SE Clothing Stores? (/Thread-How-can-I-SE-Clothing-Stores) |
How can I SE Clothing Stores? - phobetor00 - 05-15-2019 What would be the best for these: DNA, Empty Box or another method? In case of Empty Box, do you think it would work with - say - some light weight jeans + shirts (around 500 g - 1 kg)? RE: How to SE Clothing Stores - Drako - 05-15-2019 From the initial looks of the thread, I thought this would be a tutorial on social engineering, but you're actually asking a question. Try changing the thread title to "How Can I SE Clothing Stores?". RE: How to SE Clothing Stores - phobetor00 - 05-15-2019 (05-15-2019, 08:42 PM)Drako Wrote: From the initial looks of the thread, I thought this would be a tutorial on social engineering, but you're actually asking a question. Try changing the thread title to "How Can I SE Clothing Stores?". You're right, thanks for the advice. If you want to leave any input on how to do it, please be my guest! I'm new to this whole thing
RE: How can I SE Clothing Stores? - mothered - 05-16-2019 500 grams alone, Is too heavy for the missing Item method. The DNA or wrong Item received method, are both suitable. Alternatively, If It's small enough, you can box them. RE: How can I SE Clothing Stores? - l33t - 05-17-2019 (05-16-2019, 06:14 AM)mothered Wrote: 500 grams alone, Is too heavy for the missing Item method. how much would you say is the max for a missing item method ? RE: How can I SE Clothing Stores? - mothered - 05-17-2019 (05-17-2019, 11:45 AM)l33t Wrote:(05-16-2019, 06:14 AM)mothered Wrote: 500 grams alone, Is too heavy for the missing Item method. Generally speaking, around 100 grams. You can certainly get away with heavier Items, but companies/carriers who do not round up the weight on consignment thereby document It's "exactness", would be problematic for the SE'er. |