![]() |
|
Have you seen this? - Printable Version +- Sinisterly (https://sinister.li) +-- Forum: Computers (https://sinister.li/Forum-Computers) +--- Forum: Operating Systems (https://sinister.li/Forum-Operating-Systems) +--- Thread: Have you seen this? (/Thread-Have-you-seen-this) |
Have you seen this? - Pringle - 02-18-2019 There's an os that takes up 1.44mb of space and requires 8mb of ram. That's right. Not gb but mb. I don't know if you've heard of it, but I don't believe this at all. I really want to setup dualboot with this now... Link for anyone else who wants it:http://kolibrios.org/en/ RE: Have you seen this? - PicoMan - 02-18-2019 not sure why i need this and what to start with it... RE: Have you seen this? - mothered - 02-18-2019 Quote:8mb of ram. That's right. Not gb but mb Back In my days of running the good old 16-Bit "Windows 3.1", only 2MB of Ram was required. I'll check your link after this post. RE: Have you seen this? - Pringle - 02-18-2019 (02-18-2019, 11:24 AM)mothered Wrote:Quote:8mb of ram. That's right. Not gb but mb that frightens me RE: Have you seen this? - darkninja1980 - 02-18-2019 (02-18-2019, 07:03 AM)Ankrad Wrote: There's an os that takes up 1.44mb of space and requires 8mb of ram. That's right. Not gb but mb. I don't know if you've heard of it, but I don't believe this at all. I really want to setup dualboot with this now... I am not very impressed with this OS system. it does remind me of old school windows 98 and lower. RE: Have you seen this? - Pringle - 02-18-2019 (02-18-2019, 02:05 PM)darkninja1980 Wrote:(02-18-2019, 07:03 AM)Ankrad Wrote: There's an os that takes up 1.44mb of space and requires 8mb of ram. That's right. Not gb but mb. I don't know if you've heard of it, but I don't believe this at all. I really want to setup dualboot with this now... smh... disappointing tastes RE: Have you seen this? - darkninja1980 - 02-18-2019 (02-18-2019, 02:12 PM)Ankrad Wrote:(02-18-2019, 02:05 PM)darkninja1980 Wrote:(02-18-2019, 07:03 AM)Ankrad Wrote: There's an os that takes up 1.44mb of space and requires 8mb of ram. That's right. Not gb but mb. I don't know if you've heard of it, but I don't believe this at all. I really want to setup dualboot with this now... very true. RE: Have you seen this? - mothered - 02-18-2019 (02-18-2019, 01:47 PM)Ankrad Wrote:(02-18-2019, 11:24 AM)mothered Wrote:Quote:8mb of ram. That's right. Not gb but mb It was actually a pleasant experience at the time. I still have the OS In a bootable ISO file. What capacity do you think Windows 3.1 Is? RE: Have you seen this? - darkninja1980 - 02-18-2019 (02-18-2019, 03:30 PM)mothered Wrote:(02-18-2019, 01:47 PM)Ankrad Wrote:(02-18-2019, 11:24 AM)mothered Wrote: Back In my days of running the good old 16-Bit "Windows 3.1", only 2MB of Ram was required. 100% IBM compatible computer. 80386 or higher processor aka a “386” system. 2MB or better RAM. 8MB Hard disk drive space. 3.5 inch or 5.25 inch floppy disc drive. VGA video. Keyboard and Mouse. DOS 3.1 or higher. RE: Have you seen this? - mothered - 02-19-2019 (02-18-2019, 10:50 PM)darkninja1980 Wrote:(02-18-2019, 03:30 PM)mothered Wrote:(02-18-2019, 01:47 PM)Ankrad Wrote: that frightens me No. You've Googled the "system requirements", which Is not what I asked. My question Is: Quote:What capacity do you think Windows 3.1 Is? |