(12-06-2013, 06:12 AM)Maravilla Wrote: I respect your opinion, however..
1. I never said the Bible turns anybody to a saint, I said "I'm" not the type.
2. "Such as" writings that have been proven by time to coincide with writings from other times, now can these people from different places and times have "guessed" the same things? I don't think so.
3. Believing is different as you say, but how come "science" hasn't been able to prove that God doesn't exist? Evolution? Pfft, so some primates "decided" and "chose" to not evolve over time? With all the science "observation", etc. they haven't been able to prove this either? And how about the proof and facts? If we did evolve then surely "science" would have found differences in fossil densities over time right? Find the missing link right? WRONG, guess what, they haven't and won't. This is one topic where we can go forever discussing, but the important thing is that no matter what you believe in, then it's your right. I'm not talking about religion here, I'm talking about God.

(12-06-2013, 06:12 AM)Maravilla Wrote: I respect your opinion, however..
1. I never said the Bible turns anybody to a saint, I said "I'm" not the type.
2. "Such as" writings that have been proven by time to coincide with writings from other times, now can these people from different places and times have "guessed" the same things? I don't think so.
3. Believing is different as you say, but how come "science" hasn't been able to prove that God doesn't exist? Evolution? Pfft, so some primates "decided" and "chose" to not evolve over time? With all the science "observation", etc. they haven't been able to prove this either? And how about the proof and facts? If we did evolve then surely "science" would have found differences in fossil densities over time right? Find the missing link right? WRONG, guess what, they haven't and won't. This is one topic where we can go forever discussing, but the important thing is that no matter what you believe in, then it's your right. I'm not talking about religion here, I'm talking about God.

(12-06-2013, 07:00 AM)Maravilla Wrote: 1. You suspect very wrong, we all have a choice.
2. So you choose to believe in a "theory" that if its right then undoubtedly we would have found proof of this change in the model creation or evolution, for decades, evolutionists have searched for fossils of these links to prove the creation model wrong. Although millions of fossils have been unearthed, even evolutionists acknowledge that the links have not been found? Keep waiting then I guess.
3.Same can be said for science, it doesn't mean it doesn't exist either. Here's the thing, we can't prove one or the other, but we believers don't spend our life trying to prove something wrong, we just believe in our faith, unlike science which seems to be always one step behind in God's way, never ever finding what they forever have looked for, we found God, because he found us first, that's good enough for us.
If a fair maiden kisses a frog which instantly changes into a handsome prince, we would call it a fairy tale. But if the frog takes 40 million years to turn into a prince, we call it evolution. Time is the evolutionist's magic wand. Fairy tales come in many forms!

Quote:A scientific theory is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world, based on knowledge that has been repeatedly confirmed through observation and experimentation. Scientists create scientific theories from hypotheses that have been corroborated through the scientific method, then gather evidence to test their accuracy. As with all forms of scientific knowledge, scientific theories are inductive in nature and aim for predictive and explanatory force.

(12-06-2013, 07:00 AM)Maravilla Wrote: 1. You suspect very wrong, we all have a choice.
2. So you choose to believe in a "theory" that if its right then undoubtedly we would have found proof of this change in the model creation or evolution, for decades, evolutionists have searched for fossils of these links to prove the creation model wrong. Although millions of fossils have been unearthed, even evolutionists acknowledge that the links have not been found? Keep waiting then I guess.
3.Same can be said for science, it doesn't mean it doesn't exist either. Here's the thing, we can't prove one or the other, but we believers don't spend our life trying to prove something wrong, we just believe in our faith, unlike science which seems to be always one step behind in God's way, never ever finding what they forever have looked for, we found God, because he found us first, that's good enough for us.
If a fair maiden kisses a frog which instantly changes into a handsome prince, we would call it a fairy tale. But if the frog takes 40 million years to turn into a prince, we call it evolution. Time is the evolutionist's magic wand. Fairy tales come in many forms!

Quote:A scientific theory is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world, based on knowledge that has been repeatedly confirmed through observation and experimentation. Scientists create scientific theories from hypotheses that have been corroborated through the scientific method, then gather evidence to test their accuracy. As with all forms of scientific knowledge, scientific theories are inductive in nature and aim for predictive and explanatory force.

(12-06-2013, 07:00 AM)Maravilla Wrote: 1. You suspect very wrong, we all have a choice.
2. So you choose to believe in a "theory" that if its right then undoubtedly we would have found proof of this change in the model creation or evolution, for decades, evolutionists have searched for fossils of these links to prove the creation model wrong. Although millions of fossils have been unearthed, even evolutionists acknowledge that the links have not been found? Keep waiting then I guess.
3.Same can be said for science, it doesn't mean it doesn't exist either. Here's the thing, we can't prove one or the other, but we believers don't spend our life trying to prove something wrong, we just believe in our faith, unlike science which seems to be always one step behind in God's way, never ever finding what they forever have looked for, we found God, because he found us first, that's good enough for us.
If a fair maiden kisses a frog which instantly changes into a handsome prince, we would call it a fairy tale. But if the frog takes 40 million years to turn into a prince, we call it evolution. Time is the evolutionist's magic wand. Fairy tales come in many forms!

(12-06-2013, 07:00 AM)Maravilla Wrote: 1. You suspect very wrong, we all have a choice.
2. So you choose to believe in a "theory" that if its right then undoubtedly we would have found proof of this change in the model creation or evolution, for decades, evolutionists have searched for fossils of these links to prove the creation model wrong. Although millions of fossils have been unearthed, even evolutionists acknowledge that the links have not been found? Keep waiting then I guess.
3.Same can be said for science, it doesn't mean it doesn't exist either. Here's the thing, we can't prove one or the other, but we believers don't spend our life trying to prove something wrong, we just believe in our faith, unlike science which seems to be always one step behind in God's way, never ever finding what they forever have looked for, we found God, because he found us first, that's good enough for us.
If a fair maiden kisses a frog which instantly changes into a handsome prince, we would call it a fairy tale. But if the frog takes 40 million years to turn into a prince, we call it evolution. Time is the evolutionist's magic wand. Fairy tales come in many forms!