+- Sinisterly (https://sinister.li)
+-- Forum: General (https://sinister.li/Forum-General)
+--- Forum: The Lounge (https://sinister.li/Forum-The-Lounge)
+--- Thread: Pomf.sinister.ly - Reliable Filehosting (/Thread-Pomf-sinister-ly-Reliable-Filehosting)
RE: Pomf.sinister.ly - Reliable Filehosting - Oni - 08-09-2017
The Pomf is back after short downtime, for those of you that messaged.
RE: Pomf.sinister.ly - Reliable Filehosting - ramo25 - 12-07-2017
in 3 browsers the same thing: The connection has timed out =,X @Oni
RE: Pomf.sinister.ly - Reliable Filehosting - Oni - 12-10-2017
After a pretty decent downtime both the Chan/Pomf will be back online shortly.
RE: Pomf.sinister.ly - Reliable Filehosting - Esoterith - 12-11-2017
(12-10-2017, 11:37 PM)Oni Wrote: After a pretty decent downtime both the Chan/Pomf will be back online shortly.
They both went down at the same time. Quite odd.
RE: Pomf.sinister.ly - Reliable Filehosting - Oni - 12-11-2017
(12-11-2017, 01:37 AM)Vespei Wrote:(12-10-2017, 11:37 PM)Oni Wrote: After a pretty decent downtime both the Chan/Pomf will be back online shortly.
They both went down at the same time. Quite odd.
Normally I'm not this transparent, but the services cost extra money and time. I've been busy IRL and staff was discussing whether or not to keep the services online. We waited a bit of time to pay the bills while it was being discussed. Ultimately I decided that we will keep them up, although that depends how much they are utilized in the future. Implications such as inactivity on the Chan or AV's blocking the Pomf were a couple of reasons we had the discussion.
RE: Pomf.sinister.ly - Reliable Filehosting - zorrophreak - 12-11-2017
(12-11-2017, 02:04 AM)Oni Wrote:(12-11-2017, 01:37 AM)Vespei Wrote:(12-10-2017, 11:37 PM)Oni Wrote: After a pretty decent downtime both the Chan/Pomf will be back online shortly.
They both went down at the same time. Quite odd.
Normally I'm not this transparent, but the services cost extra money and time. I've been busy IRL and staff was discussing whether or not to keep the services online. We waited a bit of time to pay the bills while it was being discussed. Ultimately I decided that we will keep them up, although that depends how much they are utilized in the future. Implications such as inactivity on the Chan or AV's blocking the Pomf were a couple of reasons we had the discussion.
I'm not sure about activity on the pomf, but its always been a pretty useful service. The Discord and actual forum are so active that the chan becomes more of a novelty than an actual service of use. In the future if you look to downsize the other services of the site, I think the chan is probably one of the less used services.
You see the actual stats so use your judgement.
RE: Pomf.sinister.ly - Reliable Filehosting - Blink - 12-12-2017
(12-11-2017, 02:04 AM)Oni Wrote:(12-11-2017, 01:37 AM)Vespei Wrote:(12-10-2017, 11:37 PM)Oni Wrote: After a pretty decent downtime both the Chan/Pomf will be back online shortly.
They both went down at the same time. Quite odd.
Normally I'm not this transparent, but the services cost extra money and time. I've been busy IRL and staff was discussing whether or not to keep the services online. We waited a bit of time to pay the bills while it was being discussed. Ultimately I decided that we will keep them up, although that depends how much they are utilized in the future. Implications such as inactivity on the Chan or AV's blocking the Pomf were a couple of reasons we had the discussion.
Maybe rename pomf? I'm pretty sure it's based on domain, so changing it would remove the warning unless Google decides to add it back again.
RE: Pomf.sinister.ly - Reliable Filehosting - Synthx - 12-12-2017
(12-12-2017, 01:03 AM)Ender Wrote:(12-11-2017, 02:04 AM)Oni Wrote:(12-11-2017, 01:37 AM)Vespei Wrote: They both went down at the same time. Quite odd.
Normally I'm not this transparent, but the services cost extra money and time. I've been busy IRL and staff was discussing whether or not to keep the services online. We waited a bit of time to pay the bills while it was being discussed. Ultimately I decided that we will keep them up, although that depends how much they are utilized in the future. Implications such as inactivity on the Chan or AV's blocking the Pomf were a couple of reasons we had the discussion.
Maybe rename pomf? I'm pretty sure it's based on domain, so changing it would remove the warning unless Google decides to add it back again.
Not a bad idea at all. I think that would work.
RE: Pomf.sinister.ly - Reliable Filehosting - Oni - 12-12-2017
(12-12-2017, 01:03 AM)Ender Wrote:(12-11-2017, 02:04 AM)Oni Wrote:(12-11-2017, 01:37 AM)Vespei Wrote: They both went down at the same time. Quite odd.
Normally I'm not this transparent, but the services cost extra money and time. I've been busy IRL and staff was discussing whether or not to keep the services online. We waited a bit of time to pay the bills while it was being discussed. Ultimately I decided that we will keep them up, although that depends how much they are utilized in the future. Implications such as inactivity on the Chan or AV's blocking the Pomf were a couple of reasons we had the discussion.
Maybe rename pomf? I'm pretty sure it's based on domain, so changing it would remove the warning unless Google decides to add it back again.
It's more likely we'll blacklist executable files and appeal to the AVs/Google/etc.
RE: Pomf.sinister.ly - Reliable Filehosting - pvnk - 12-12-2017
What's the max size BROTHER?