+- Sinisterly (https://sinister.li)
+-- Forum: General (https://sinister.li/Forum-General)
+--- Forum: World News (https://sinister.li/Forum-World-News)
+--- Thread: HE WON! (/Thread-HE-WON)
RE: HE WON! - Loki123 - 11-25-2016
(11-24-2016, 03:24 PM)meow Wrote:(11-24-2016, 03:18 PM)Loki123 Wrote:(11-24-2016, 03:07 PM)meow Wrote: I'm not too dumb to get the metaphor, it's simply a false equivalency and doesn't actually answer my question. Becoming the top by default (inheriting the throne) does not mean getting bigger. China right now can trade with anyone they want, the US pulling out of trade with them isn't going to effect that. Either way, the US is China's #1 customer; if China loses them, they're going to sink like a stone, and if they don't sink like a stone, they're certainly not going to get bigger because of it.
Not directly because of it. It will not be good for China but in reality it is very hard to see China sinking due to it. China will suffer but they will not sink. That is quite stupid actually to think the US is that important.
Btw, China will grow either way. There will be a setback, I can't deny that but their econony will get stronger in the long run.
Quote:That is quite stupid actually to think the US is that important.
T H E U S I S C H I N A ' S N U M B E R O N E T R A D I N G P A R T N E R O T H E R T H A N T H E E U, O B V I O U S L Y T H E Y A R E I M P O R T A N T
There, I spelled it out for you since you don't seem to understand.
Could you explain why you think their economy will get stronger in the long run? Given that I already said "China right now can trade with anyone they want, the US pulling out of trade with them isn't going to effect that."
Important != Being so important they will sink.
One door closes another one opens. China will look elsewhere for imports and exports. Yes, their economy will take a somewhat big hit due to this. But they aren't in a position where they will sink. Through banks (uniting asia under one bank) along with other means. Loosing the united states as their trading partner will be a hit, I have NEVER said something against that, but in the long run, as the fastest growing economy in the world. They will continue to grow. But you might want to think about the fact that the United States are moving into a direction where no country in the world might be ready to trade with them due to their exit from the WTO.
Anyway, I don't need to explain this to you further, I already have and you seem incapable of accepting that the United States aren't as important as you think.
RE: HE WON! - meow - 11-26-2016
(11-25-2016, 09:25 PM)Loki123 Wrote: Anyway, I don't need to explain this to you further, I already have and you seem incapable of accepting that the United States aren't as important as you think.
You can keep playing pretend by acting like I'm the dumb one here, but in reality you still haven't provided any evidence that China's economy will grow larger if the US pulls out of trade with them, you just keep evading it. Also, playing pretend won't change the fact that anyone who comes across this thread will quickly realize that you have no idea what the fuck you're talking about.
RE: HE WON! - Jiggly - 11-26-2016
(11-22-2016, 03:15 AM)meow Wrote:(11-14-2016, 12:58 AM)Jiggly Wrote:(11-12-2016, 09:53 PM)meow Wrote: That isn't elaboration. What scandals? I genuinely hope you don't think Hillary would be better, especially if you're judging on the basis of scandals.
I think you misunderstand my viewpoint. I am talking about the foul things he has said in public. Nothing more. I don't make judgements on the basis of scandals, I make judgements based upon information. I really don't think Hilary would be better at all aha.
Do you have a very bad memory or do you just type your posts by mashing random keys? You said
Quote:When I say Trump being president is horrible, is purely on the basis of the scandals.
And now you're saying
Quote:I don't make judgements on the basis of scandals
Fair enough. Scandals was entirely the wrong term and I didn't elaborate what I meant properly the first time round. I don't really care about Trumps personality beyond the fact that it is unpleasant and it would be better if the US president seemed more professional than how Trump has been portrayed by the media. In terms of his ability to lead the US, I don't think his personality will be that much of a concern.
Now would you like to stop being rude? It is actually possible to point out a mistake without making yourself look like an asshole.
RE: HE WON! - meow - 11-26-2016
(11-26-2016, 07:11 AM)Jiggly Wrote:(11-22-2016, 03:15 AM)meow Wrote:(11-14-2016, 12:58 AM)Jiggly Wrote: I think you misunderstand my viewpoint. I am talking about the foul things he has said in public. Nothing more. I don't make judgements on the basis of scandals, I make judgements based upon information. I really don't think Hilary would be better at all aha.
Do you have a very bad memory or do you just type your posts by mashing random keys? You said
Quote:When I say Trump being president is horrible, is purely on the basis of the scandals.
And now you're saying
Quote:I don't make judgements on the basis of scandals
Fair enough. Scandals was entirely the wrong term and I didn't elaborate what I meant properly the first time round. I don't really care about Trumps personality beyond the fact that it is unpleasant and it would be better if the US president seemed more professional than how Trump has been portrayed by the media. In terms of his ability to lead the US, I don't think his personality will be that much of a concern.
Now would you like to stop being rude? It is actually possible to point out a mistake without making yourself look like an asshole.
Being rude more than often gets the point across. Facts don't care about your feelings.
RE: HE WON! - zenith - 11-26-2016
I love how some people are like "no matter who wins, we should be accepting and be together" then right when he won they were like "FUCKING RIGGED BULLSHIT OH MY GOD FACISTS"
Practice what you preach kids.
RE: HE WON! - 817_091_278 - 12-13-2016
(11-10-2016, 03:46 AM)pvnk Wrote:(11-09-2016, 09:38 PM)817_091_278 Wrote:Shows that she's only human.(11-09-2016, 09:10 PM)Cosvo Wrote: That man don't know shit about politics outisde the US... Really hope their ain't gonna be no nukeclear war.. I'm not saying that he is gonna start it, but Russia may have a free lane on attacking Europe while Trump will watch
I'm simply glad that the establishment are getting slowly ruined. I agree that Hillary Clinton is more competent and more intelligent, but she sucks up to money.
Agreed. I always thought Bernie Sanders was a alien in disguise!
RE: HE WON! - 817_091_278 - 12-13-2016
(11-11-2016, 06:07 AM)insidious Wrote:(11-11-2016, 03:08 AM)meow Wrote: Trump wasn't elected to "prove a point", he was elected because people would like a change.
Didn't say that
I mean that if OP voted/supported Trump just to prove a point, that is wrong or, I don't think, why one should vote for a president.
I don't live in the United States, but if I did, I'd definitely support a third-party candidate.
RE: HE WON! - Korvidius - 12-13-2016
I'm glad he won, I'm sick of the establishment as well as many others. I just hope he makes us proud for electing him.
RE: HE WON! - Korvidius - 12-13-2016
(11-26-2016, 08:41 PM)Zenith Wrote: I love how some people are like "no matter who wins, we should be accepting and be together" then right when he won they were like "FUCKING RIGGED BULLSHIT OH MY GOD FACISTS"
Practice what you preach kids.
That was an actual Tweet by some Feminist, wasn't it?
RE: HE WON! - 817_091_278 - 12-13-2016
(12-13-2016, 09:54 PM)Pyxis Wrote:(11-26-2016, 08:41 PM)Zenith Wrote: I love how some people are like "no matter who wins, we should be accepting and be together" then right when he won they were like "FUCKING RIGGED BULLSHIT OH MY GOD FACISTS"
Practice what you preach kids.
That was an actual Tweet by some Feminist, wasn't it?
Yes. Yes it was.