Sinisterly
NASA hacked by AnonSec - Printable Version

+- Sinisterly (https://sinister.li)
+-- Forum: General (https://sinister.li/Forum-General)
+--- Forum: The Lounge (https://sinister.li/Forum-The-Lounge)
+--- Thread: NASA hacked by AnonSec (/Thread-NASA-hacked-by-AnonSec)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6


RE: NASA hacked by AnonSec - Cranky_mybb_import6721 - 02-03-2016

There is no way it took less than one second to crack NASA's password.


RE: NASA hacked by AnonSec - Skryptec - 02-03-2016

(02-03-2016, 06:46 PM)Cranky Wrote: There is no way it took less than one second to crack NASA's password.

it did.


RE: NASA hacked by AnonSec - Skryptec - 02-04-2016

Ayo! I'm bumping this, because the world has to see this.


RE: NASA hacked by AnonSec - zenM8 - 02-04-2016

Good job AnonSec.


RE: NASA hacked by AnonSec - Captin_Lulzboat - 02-04-2016

Im having issues getting a page up right now. Here are the questions asked and the response.

lulzboat: Can you confirm the NASA hack really happened? Was it recent or old news just surfacing?
AnonSEC: The hack happened yes. The reason there is older articles is because we released 128mb sample file about 6 months ago which already made headlines.

lulzboat: What were your motives? What did you try to accomplish? Did you find what you were looking for?
AnonSEC: Our Motives were to find proof of the existenze of chemtrails/geoenginering... We found a lot of data based on air samples taken by the drones data we obtained. However none of us a scientist that could truly analyze the data and confirm that our findings are indeed linked to weather manipulations. That's why we send the data to organizations like wifi or infowars which have better resources to confirm or deny our supisions.

anonSEC: im not to picky and don't really care about publicity. Just remember that everything we do as individuals for the team will be considered as a team effort since we all contribute in different ways. Perhaps as a closing comment I would like to state that's, a few journalist and NASA are trying to undermine this hack as a mundane and the information obtain as supposedly publicly avalible. the point that a lot of are missing is that (A) the ability of a common man to gain access to NASA NAS;s in the first place. also im certain that the employee data definetly inst public nor are the individual flight plans of each drone. In addition, I was one of the teamexpressing concern of injecting altered flight plan packets and objected to the attempt of crashing a drone in the first place. im a truth seeker like yourself not a brainless teen on drugs or alcohol like some. in addition I want to thank you for hearing ourside of the story and not only the defaults kind thanks again brother.

https://www.chicagoanonymous.org/blog/articles/2/interview-with-anonsec

don't judge me. It looks ugly but idc, lol for now.


RE: NASA hacked by AnonSec - Skryptec - 02-04-2016

(02-04-2016, 06:09 PM)Captin_Lulzboat Wrote: Im having issues getting a page up right now. Here are the questions asked and the response.

lulzboat: Can you confirm the NASA hack really happened? Was it recent or old news just surfacing?
AnonSEC: The hack happened yes. The reason there is older articles is because we released 128mb sample file about 6 months ago which already made headlines.

lulzboat: What were your motives? What did you try to accomplish? Did you find what you were looking for?
AnonSEC: Our Motives were to find proof of the existenze of chemtrails/geoenginering... We found a lot of data based on air samples taken by the drones data we obtained. However none of us a scientist that could truly analyze the data and confirm that our findings are indeed linked to  weather manipulations. That's why we send the data to organizations like wifi or infowars which have better resources to confirm or deny our supisions.

anonSEC: im not to picky and don't really care about publicity. Just remember that everything we do as individuals for the team will be considered as a team effort since we all contribute in different ways. Perhaps as a closing comment I would like to state that's, a few journalist and NASA are trying to undermine this hack as a mundane and the information obtain as supposedly publicly avalible. the point that a lot of are missing is that (A) the ability of a common man to gain access to NASA NAS;s in the first place. also im certain that the employee data definetly inst public nor are the individual flight plans of each drone. In addition, I was one of the teamexpressing concern of injecting altered flight plan packets and objected to the attempt of crashing a drone in the first place. im a truth seeker like yourself not a brainless teen on drugs or alcohol like some.  in addition I want to thank you for hearing ourside of the story and not only the defaults kind thanks again brother.

https://www.chicagoanonymous.org/blog/articles/2/interview-with-anonsec

don't judge me. It looks ugly but idc, lol for now.

Nice, I am btw working on it and will have it done tomorrow.


RE: NASA hacked by AnonSec - Captin_Lulzboat - 02-04-2016

(02-04-2016, 06:44 PM)Skryptec Wrote:
(02-04-2016, 06:09 PM)Captin_Lulzboat Wrote: Im having issues getting a page up right now. Here are the questions asked and the response.

lulzboat: Can you confirm the NASA hack really happened? Was it recent or old news just surfacing?
AnonSEC: The hack happened yes. The reason there is older articles is because we released 128mb sample file about 6 months ago which already made headlines.

lulzboat: What were your motives? What did you try to accomplish? Did you find what you were looking for?
AnonSEC: Our Motives were to find proof of the existenze of chemtrails/geoenginering... We found a lot of data based on air samples taken by the drones data we obtained. However none of us a scientist that could truly analyze the data and confirm that our findings are indeed linked to  weather manipulations. That's why we send the data to organizations like wifi or infowars which have better resources to confirm or deny our supisions.

anonSEC: im not to picky and don't really care about publicity. Just remember that everything we do as individuals for the team will be considered as a team effort since we all contribute in different ways. Perhaps as a closing comment I would like to state that's, a few journalist and NASA are trying to undermine this hack as a mundane and the information obtain as supposedly publicly avalible. the point that a lot of are missing is that (A) the ability of a common man to gain access to NASA NAS;s in the first place. also im certain that the employee data definetly inst public nor are the individual flight plans of each drone. In addition, I was one of the teamexpressing concern of injecting altered flight plan packets and objected to the attempt of crashing a drone in the first place. im a truth seeker like yourself not a brainless teen on drugs or alcohol like some.  in addition I want to thank you for hearing ourside of the story and not only the defaults kind thanks again brother.

https://www.chicagoanonymous.org/blog/articles/2/interview-with-anonsec

don't judge me. It looks ugly but idc, lol for now.

Nice, I am btw working on it and will have it done tomorrow.

That's temporary till I figure out what I want to do.  Will get re done and look nice soon


RE: NASA hacked by AnonSec - Skryptec - 02-04-2016

Bumping this to the top.


RE: NASA hacked by AnonSec - Meatg0d - 02-05-2016

Really.. NASA got hacked? Not sure what to say other then NASA's security sucks. Nice share OP, didn't know this until now.


RE: NASA hacked by AnonSec - Red_SF - 02-05-2016

(02-05-2016, 10:13 AM)Meatg0d Wrote: Really.. NASA got hacked? Not sure what to say other then NASA's security sucks. Nice share OP, didn't know this until now.

I don't really see why people seem to assume that big name corporations have god like security in the first place lol