+- Sinisterly (https://sinister.li)
+-- Forum: General (https://sinister.li/Forum-General)
+--- Forum: Announcements (https://sinister.li/Forum-Announcements)
+---- Forum: Suggestions (https://sinister.li/Forum-Suggestions)
+----- Forum: Old Suggestions (https://sinister.li/Forum-Old-Suggestions)
+----- Thread: Why I personally think Reverence should be disbanded . (/Thread-Why-I-personally-think-Reverence-should-be-disbanded)
RE: Why I personally think Reverence should be disbanded . - Nyx - 09-27-2014
(09-26-2014, 11:26 PM)Fury Wrote: If the owner chooses to change the direction of the group it should not be a problem. It's their group to do as they please.
Vipr may be gone, and Adorapuff is in charge now. He can change the direction as he pleases. This was a pointless ass thread and it's not up for community vote if HIS group is disbanded or not.
But he didn't pay for it. Vipr paid the price for the group to become what it is, it shouldn't so easily be changed. One thing I do want to note, is that it's not going to bother me to much if it's changed. The reason I never applied for the group is because when groups on forum's sole purpose is to 'be HQ', it always turns into a massive circlejerk and nothing good usually ever comes from it. All this being said, I think Reverence should just be shut down. It has run its course and now it's dying out. And like I said, I could care less what happens.
RE: Why I personally think Reverence should be disbanded . - Fury - 09-27-2014
I give up. GL Reverence.
Done with this thread.. Lol.
RE: Why I personally think Reverence should be disbanded . - Silent Reaper - 09-27-2014
White power!
(referring to Reverence's colour)
There would be a lack of white people if you disbanded Reverence and noone for us to mug if you did.
(referring to member's darker colour) Think about it, take a second.
RE: Why I personally think Reverence should be disbanded . - Eclipse - 09-27-2014
(09-27-2014, 12:08 AM)Alex Wrote: Reverence isn't a "HQ" group anymore it's a hacking group.
That does not make sense.
(09-27-2014, 12:14 AM)roger_smith Wrote: I guess I don't understand the difference then? can we not post high quality content related to hacking/linux/etc?
This.
(09-27-2014, 01:42 AM)Dyme Wrote: I tried making this argument in early January of this year, and it didn't seem to be a very popular opinion: https://sinister.li/Thread-Oni-please-close-the-gates?pid=200798#pid200798
Received this as a response which I think sums up the view of most active members here: https://sinister.li/Thread-Oni-please-close-the-gates?pid=200919#pid200919
And that view is supported by the site's administrator: https://sinister.li/Thread-Oni-please-close-the-gates?pid=200921#pid200921
Feel free to read the rest of the discussion on that thread as well. While I still stand by my definition of "high quality", I do realize that it's not what members here want. As @Oni has stated before, this is no longer really a technology forum as it is a "fuck around on the internet with friends" forum. Oni can do whatever he wants with his forum, and as of late I think he's made it pretty clear that having our type of high quality threads isn't his #1 priority:
I don't know how members view this definition now, however. Perhaps more will accept it if they hear it from you rather than me.
The term HQ is pretty wide, I stand by what I said what I though a HQ member was, but let me elaborate. You're right when you say they should be posting detailed tutorials etc. but what was meant by my post is that it should not just be limited to that. A HQ member is not just his threads.
RE: Why I personally think Reverence should be disbanded . - Alex - 09-28-2014
![[Image: 2l5Up99.png]](http://i.imgur.com/2l5Up99.png)
RE: Why I personally think Reverence should be disbanded . - Eclipse - 09-28-2014
(09-28-2014, 05:04 PM)Alex Wrote:
![[Image: cea813e79f7b06f11d7b135250699bae.png]](http://i.gyazo.com/cea813e79f7b06f11d7b135250699bae.png)
![[Image: 43ea60b8c91b0a775f9b100654120c8d.png]](http://i.gyazo.com/43ea60b8c91b0a775f9b100654120c8d.png)
![[Image: c98ec117bd7773dcae18080a820d18b5.png]](http://i.gyazo.com/c98ec117bd7773dcae18080a820d18b5.png)
RE: Why I personally think Reverence should be disbanded . - Alex - 09-28-2014
(09-28-2014, 05:27 PM)Eclipse Wrote:
Did he ever change his statement nope?
What does a date have to do with anything l0l
RE: Why I personally think Reverence should be disbanded . - Eclipse - 09-28-2014
(09-28-2014, 05:30 PM)Alex Wrote: Did he ever change his statement nope?
What does a date have to do with anything l0l
Co-owner of Reverence, present tense. Back in march...
RE: Why I personally think Reverence should be disbanded . - Alex - 09-28-2014
(09-28-2014, 05:46 PM)Eclipse Wrote: Co-owner of Reverence, present tense. Back in march...
He purchased the group and he never said anything differently about me being co-owner so he statement is still technically valid.
RE: Why I personally think Reverence should be disbanded . - Lain - 09-28-2014
Doesn't he have his own forum now or something? Send him a message and get him to return to put an end to this ridiculous debacle.