![]() |
|
The Truth About BlueScreen - Printable Version +- Sinisterly (https://sinister.li) +-- Forum: General (https://sinister.li/Forum-General) +--- Forum: The Lounge (https://sinister.li/Forum-The-Lounge) +---- Forum: Serious Discussion (https://sinister.li/Forum-Serious-Discussion) +---- Thread: The Truth About BlueScreen (/Thread-The-Truth-About-BlueScreen) |
RE: The Truth About BlueScreen - w00t - 12-13-2013 (12-12-2013, 06:36 AM)Satan Wrote: Sexuality as referenced here is used in place of sexual orientation (homosexuality, contrasted from heterosexuality and bisexuality), which deals with genders. Homosexuality was treated as a "philia" under that definition for many thousands of years. You can't use the word "sexuality" to mean "sexual orientation", then proceed to further modify the definition of the latter to the secondary definition, just because it fits your image of what a sexuality is. A persons sexuality is their orientation or preference. Even disregarding this, the reason it is classified as a philia is the same reason homosexuality was deemed a disorder for many thousands of years. The majority of people cannot understand it. There is nothing inherently less "human" about liking those younger than you than liking those of the same sex. If we argue homosexuality is not a disorder, we are no longer classifying a mindset that makes that person unable to reproduce with people they sexually prefer as a disorder. http://www.courts.ca.gov/documents/Amer_Psychological_Assn_Amicus_Curiae_Brief.pdf It had to be legally argued that homosexuality was not a disorder, and that the very same association you cite was wrong in classifying it as such( they did so in the 50s ). While no official body still recognizes homosexuality as a disorder, I guarantee you the hyper-religious conservatives across the globe would still consider it as such, and they are greater in number than you may like to admit. RE: The Truth About BlueScreen - Jolly - 12-13-2013 (12-13-2013, 06:13 AM)w00t Wrote: Homosexuality was treated as a "philia" under that definition for many thousands of years. You can't use the word "sexuality" to mean "sexual orientation", then proceed to further modify the definition of the latter to the secondary definition, just because it fits your image of what a sexuality is. A persons sexuality is their orientation or preference. Even disregarding this, the reason it is classified as a philia is the same reason homosexuality was deemed a disorder for many thousands of years. The majority of people cannot understand it. There is nothing inherently less "human" about liking those younger than you than liking those of the same sex. If we argue homosexuality is not a disorder, we are no longer classifying a mindset that makes that person unable to reproduce with people they sexually prefer as a disorder. This actually seems quite legit, also isn't it kinda weird to try to bring out facts from only an American Association and not the countless others that are scattered around the globe? Also isn't there a more universal Association for Psychology? RE: The Truth About BlueScreen - Equinox - 12-13-2013 Well this is kind of creepy. >_> RE: The Truth About BlueScreen - w00t - 12-13-2013 (12-13-2013, 05:03 PM)Jolly Wrote: This actually seems quite legit, also isn't it kinda weird to try to bring out facts from only an American Association and not the countless others that are scattered around the globe? Oddly no, there's no international body. I tend to cite sources native to the opposition into a debate, only because it is simpler for people to understand their native tongue( and yes, British English is wildly different from American English ). RE: The Truth About BlueScreen - Darkmuseisbae - 12-14-2013 What. The. Hell...did...I...read...? RE: The Truth About BlueScreen - Equinox - 12-14-2013 (12-14-2013, 07:00 AM)JustCallMeJoe Wrote: What. The. Hell...did...I...read...?Society in a nut shell. xD Just kidding, but in all actuality, apparently BlueScreen. RE: The Truth About BlueScreen - Nyx - 12-14-2013 (12-14-2013, 07:00 AM)JustCallMeJoe Wrote: What. The. Hell...did...I...read...? If you read all the posts, it went from: 1) The Truth about Bluescreen 2) Why Bluescreen is a terrible person 3) Why disliking pedophiles is different than disliking gays 4) Why Pedophilia and Homosexuality are different 5) Why homosexuality is/isn't a mental disorder. Pretty much sums up the thread. EDIT: 6) Criminal Psychology RE: The Truth About BlueScreen - chF - 12-14-2013 I'm pretty sure this was obvious. RE: The Truth About BlueScreen - BreShiE - 12-14-2013 (12-14-2013, 08:33 AM)chF Wrote: I'm pretty sure this was obvious. Indeed it was, but I was just making it more apparent as he tried denying it. RE: The Truth About BlueScreen - Eclipse - 12-14-2013 (12-14-2013, 07:24 AM)Atmosphere Wrote: If you read all the posts, it went from: (12-14-2013, 07:24 AM)Atmosphere Wrote: If you read all the posts, it went from: I can't be asked reading the entire thread so this made my day. :'D |