Sinisterly
overclockers - Printable Version

+- Sinisterly (https://sinister.li)
+-- Forum: Hacking (https://sinister.li/Forum-Hacking)
+--- Forum: Social Engineering (https://sinister.li/Forum-Social-Engineering)
+--- Thread: overclockers (/Thread-overclockers--176862)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11


RE: overclockers - vcwerkl vkwemowver - 01-10-2023

(01-10-2023, 01:28 AM)mothered Wrote:
(01-09-2023, 04:06 PM)vcwerkl vkwemowver Wrote: Morning , given the outcome with the DPD investigation, the are happy it was delivered correctly, they do not have to provide photo evidence that it was personally handed to yourself, they take an image of where it was delivered to, the image is below.
They're totally missing the point.

It wasn't delivered correctly - If It was, you'd have the Item In your possession. They failed to fulfil their role as a carrier service to ensure the package made Its way to the "recipient" (yourself) by personally handing It to you. Given they're so sure of the package making Its way to the correct recipient, photographic evidence of that must be provided.

Be sure to reply with the above details.

okay bet, ill try that thank you! one question though, could i still use the sibling recieving and giving it to me, after i send this?


RE: overclockers - mothered - 01-10-2023

(01-10-2023, 06:51 AM)vcwerkl vkwemowver Wrote: ill try that thank you!
You're welcome.

(01-10-2023, 06:51 AM)vcwerkl vkwemowver Wrote: one question though, could i still use the sibling recieving and giving it to me, after i send this?
Absolutely.

They're not In a position to determine the events within your household, so you can certainly use that strategy.


RE: overclockers - vcwerkl vkwemowver - 01-10-2023

(01-10-2023, 10:27 AM)mothered Wrote:
(01-10-2023, 06:51 AM)vcwerkl vkwemowver Wrote: ill try that thank you!
You're welcome.

(01-10-2023, 06:51 AM)vcwerkl vkwemowver Wrote: one question though, could i still use the sibling recieving and giving it to me, after i send this?
Absolutely.

They're not In a position to determine the events within your household, so you can certainly use that strategy.


I'm afraid as the coordinates place the driver outside the correct property and they have stated "there are previous deliveries that match the disputed delivery.", there is nothing further that we can do, photo evidence as you can see is of a person with the door open accepting the goods.

If the GPS co ordinates were placed elsewhere, if the image did not match the front exterior of the property and if DPD were not confirming previous deliveries to the same address, we would have a different conclusion.

If you are still disputing that you have not received the goods, this has to be theft, I recommend contacting your local authority for further assistance.

Sorry for the inconvenience caused.


jesus man theyre annoying


RE: overclockers - mothered - 01-10-2023

(01-10-2023, 11:23 AM)vcwerkl vkwemowver Wrote: photo evidence as you can see is of a person with the door open accepting the goods.
^ What are they referring to with this?


RE: overclockers - vcwerkl vkwemowver - 01-10-2023

(01-10-2023, 11:51 AM)mothered Wrote:
(01-10-2023, 11:23 AM)vcwerkl vkwemowver Wrote: photo evidence as you can see is of a person with the door open accepting the goods.
^ What are they referring to with this?

its just my door a little open with my legs in the shot, the parcels are still on the doorstep however


RE: overclockers - mothered - 01-10-2023

(01-10-2023, 11:59 AM)vcwerkl vkwemowver Wrote: its just my door a little open with my legs in the shot, the parcels are still on the doorstep however
That changes everything. You didn't mention anything about your legs In the photo - only this:
(01-04-2023, 03:46 PM)vcwerkl vkwemowver Wrote: The dude dropped it, I opneed the door he took a photo and went off

Why are they specifically stating this:
Quote:a person with the door open accepting the goods.
It's not your legs, so who's the person accepting the goods?


RE: overclockers - vcwerkl vkwemowver - 01-10-2023

(01-10-2023, 02:49 PM)mothered Wrote:
(01-10-2023, 11:59 AM)vcwerkl vkwemowver Wrote: its just my door a little open with my legs in the shot, the parcels are still on the doorstep however
That changes everything. You didn't mention anything about your legs In the photo - only this:
(01-04-2023, 03:46 PM)vcwerkl vkwemowver Wrote: The dude dropped it, I opneed the door he took a photo and went off
ahhh apologies, didnt think there was much difference

Why are they specifically stating this:
Quote:a person with the door open accepting the goods.
It's not your legs, so who's the person accepting the goods?

its me


RE: overclockers - mothered - 01-11-2023

(01-10-2023, 04:21 PM)vcwerkl vkwemowver Wrote: its me
They've stated "a person with the door open accepting the goods".

The operative word Is "person". Are you Identified In the photo?


RE: overclockers - vcwerkl vkwemowver - 01-11-2023

(01-11-2023, 12:33 AM)mothered Wrote:
(01-10-2023, 04:21 PM)vcwerkl vkwemowver Wrote: its me
They've stated "a person with the door open accepting the goods".

The operative word Is "person". Are you Identified In the photo?

No, its just my legs behind the door, the parcels are on the front door step, my door is slightly open and my legs are behind the door

(01-11-2023, 06:17 AM)vcwerkl vkwemowver Wrote:
(01-11-2023, 12:33 AM)mothered Wrote:
(01-10-2023, 04:21 PM)vcwerkl vkwemowver Wrote: its me
They've stated "a person with the door open accepting the goods".

The operative word Is "person". Are you Identified In the photo?

No, its just my legs behind the door, the parcels are on the front door step, my door is slightly open and my legs are behind the door

you cannot see anything except my left leg, even then you only see about half of it, everything above the torso is NOT in the photo


RE: overclockers - mothered - 01-11-2023

(01-11-2023, 06:17 AM)vcwerkl vkwemowver Wrote: you cannot see anything except my left leg, even then you only see about half of it, everything above the torso is NOT in the photo
In that case, tell them to email you evidence of this:
Quote:photo evidence as you can see is of a person with the door open accepting the goods.

As per their statement above, It must clearly show the person accepting the goods.