![]() |
|
[Success] Oakley - Printable Version +- Sinisterly (https://sinister.li) +-- Forum: Hacking (https://sinister.li/Forum-Hacking) +--- Forum: Social Engineering (https://sinister.li/Forum-Social-Engineering) +--- Thread: [Success] Oakley (/Thread-Success-Oakley) |
RE: [Success] Oakley - mothered - 08-14-2022 (08-13-2022, 12:16 PM)SEDGsdgasdfgadsg Wrote: Does Luxottica owned brands/shops link information about returns?If there's no reason to thoroughly cross-check a given return, you'll be fine. RE: [Success] Oakley - shinee - 08-14-2022 as I said a few months back: Oakley is incredibly easy-going and had no problem with EB with them. very good customer service though all around. RE: [Success] Oakley - Tedness - 08-17-2022 (08-12-2022, 07:48 AM)Ordnael92 Wrote: I immediately went into chat and claimed EB: I was asked whether I wanted refund or replacement and to send some pics to an email.Did they ask for proof of signature? I am planning to SE Oakley with false identity as I have done ray-ban recently and they asked for signature proof for finalising the refund. Just curious as both brands are under same parent company and use same carrier, will it create a suspension if I use true name this time? Though address would be different. RE: [Success] Oakley - mothered - 08-17-2022 (08-17-2022, 12:20 AM)Tedness Wrote: I am planning to SE Oakley with false identityIf there's no reason to thoroughly Investigate your accounts, you're good to go. RE: [Success] Oakley - Ordnael92 - 08-17-2022 (08-17-2022, 12:20 AM)Tedness Wrote:I SEed both using the same credentials, no proof of signature asked(08-12-2022, 07:48 AM)Ordnael92 Wrote: I immediately went into chat and claimed EB: I was asked whether I wanted refund or replacement and to send some pics to an email.Did they ask for proof of signature? I am planning to SE Oakley with false identity as I have done ray-ban recently and they asked for signature proof for finalising the refund. Just curious as both brands are under same parent company and use same carrier, will it create a suspension if I use true name this time? Though address would be different. RE: [Success] Oakley - Tedness - 08-27-2022 (08-17-2022, 08:04 AM)Ordnael92 Wrote: I SEed both using the same credentials, no proof of signature askedIt took 5 working days after receiving the order to get the refund. One of quick and easy SE I have done recently. Thank you @Ordnael92 for your inputs. RE: [Success] Oakley - mothered - 08-27-2022 (08-27-2022, 11:38 AM)Tedness Wrote: It took 5 working days after receiving the order to get the refund. One of quick and easy SE I have done recently.Congrats. Was It smooth sailing from start to finish? RE: [Success] Oakley - Ordnael92 - 08-27-2022 (08-27-2022, 11:38 AM)Tedness Wrote:You're welcome, enjoy your sunglasses!(08-17-2022, 08:04 AM)Ordnael92 Wrote: I SEed both using the same credentials, no proof of signature askedIt took 5 working days after receiving the order to get the refund. One of quick and easy SE I have done recently. Thank you @Ordnael92 for your inputs. RE: [Success] Oakley - Tedness - 08-27-2022 (08-27-2022, 12:10 PM)mothered Wrote: Congrats.Thank you @mothered. It was easier than ray-ban. After receiving the delivery I sent them email with a pic for EB. Next day they replied with asking refund or replacement. After that I just had to wait for 4 days for refund to be credited in my account. RE: [Success] Oakley - Ordnael92 - 08-27-2022 (08-27-2022, 09:49 PM)Tedness Wrote:I concur. Oakley's refund was very straightforward, while Ray Ban's had a little "hiccup" along the way: they said my return number (not that I had to return anything, they just treat all refunds as returns) hadn't worked properly, so they had to manually adjust a lil things and issue the refund. After that, it took the exact same time as Oakley for the money to get back into my account.(08-27-2022, 12:10 PM)mothered Wrote: Congrats.Thank you @mothered. |