+- Sinisterly (https://sinister.li)
+-- Forum: Hacking (https://sinister.li/Forum-Hacking)
+--- Forum: Social Engineering (https://sinister.li/Forum-Social-Engineering)
+--- Thread: Recent Successful SE’s with methods and info (UK) (/Thread-Recent-Successful-SE%E2%80%99s-with-methods-and-info-UK)
RE: Recent Successful SE’s with methods and info (UK) - Nabeshin - 04-21-2022
OP might as well post the chat here, since everyone's interested
RE: Recent Successful SE’s with methods and info (UK) - bayexodus - 04-21-2022
If OP or anyone else have the chat, please send it over to me as well.
Much appreciated
Thanks
RE: Recent Successful SE’s with methods and info (UK) - contriveD - 04-21-2022
(04-20-2022, 11:59 AM)mothered Wrote:(04-20-2022, 11:40 AM)WLT17 Wrote: Empty box really worked for a MacAssessed by a representative who couldn't spell his own name.
Perhaps it worked because of the one-time exception?
Still, its definitly a questionable thing to claim on a computer.
RE: Recent Successful SE’s with methods and info (UK) - mothered - 04-22-2022
(04-21-2022, 09:40 PM)contriveD Wrote: Perhaps it worked because of the one-time exception?There's no mention of the one-time exception.
The rep/agent would've stated It as the reason for approving the claim.
RE: Recent Successful SE’s with methods and info (UK) - contriveD - 04-22-2022
(04-22-2022, 04:08 AM)mothered Wrote: There's no mention of the one-time exception.
The rep/agent would've stated It as the reason for approving the claim.
Still, (assuming that OP is being thruthful here), its rather unlikely that both claims where accepted because of ignorant representatives. There might be some kind of pattern here, which resembles somewhat a one-time exception. OP also claimed that it only worked once per account.
RE: Recent Successful SE’s with methods and info (UK) - Nabeshin - 04-22-2022
(04-22-2022, 04:08 AM)mothered Wrote:(04-21-2022, 09:40 PM)contriveD Wrote: Perhaps it worked because of the one-time exception?There's no mention of the one-time exception.
The rep/agent would've stated It as the reason for approving the claim.
He did say he used a different account from the first SE, so I'm guessing it's abusing the one-time exception after all
RE: Recent Successful SE’s with methods and info (UK) - mothered - 04-22-2022
(04-22-2022, 07:36 AM)contriveD Wrote: its rather unlikely that both claims where accepted because of ignorant representatives.You'd be surprised.
I'm referring to just the one claim, namely this:
(04-20-2022, 11:28 AM)Maxspxd Wrote: 4. Apple - MacBook 13inch - £1499 - empty box
As said, there's no mention of a one-time exception and If that's the case, he was lucky to have a brain-dead rep approve the claim.
RE: Recent Successful SE’s with methods and info (UK) - Nabeshin - 04-22-2022
(04-22-2022, 10:53 AM)mothered Wrote:(04-22-2022, 07:36 AM)contriveD Wrote: its rather unlikely that both claims where accepted because of ignorant representatives.You'd be surprised.
I'm referring to just the one claim, namely this:
(04-20-2022, 11:28 AM)Maxspxd Wrote: 4. Apple - MacBook 13inch - £1499 - empty box
As said, there's no mention of a one-time exception and If that's the case, he was lucky to have a brain-dead rep approve the claim.
But he said:
1. Apple - iPhone 13 Pro 516gb - £1249 - Empty box (empty outer shipping box - this can only be used once per set of name, address, payment details.
..
4. Apple - MacBook 13inch - £1499 - empty box - exact same as the one above but under different details.
So I'm guessing he DOES refer to the "once per account" thingy after all
RE: Recent Successful SE’s with methods and info (UK) - mothered - 04-22-2022
(04-22-2022, 12:49 PM)Nabeshin Wrote:Understood, but there's no mention of a "one-time exception".(04-22-2022, 10:53 AM)mothered Wrote:(04-22-2022, 07:36 AM)contriveD Wrote: its rather unlikely that both claims where accepted because of ignorant representatives.You'd be surprised.
I'm referring to just the one claim, namely this:
(04-20-2022, 11:28 AM)Maxspxd Wrote: 4. Apple - MacBook 13inch - £1499 - empty box
As said, there's no mention of a one-time exception and If that's the case, he was lucky to have a brain-dead rep approve the claim.
But he said:
1. Apple - iPhone 13 Pro 516gb - £1249 - Empty box (empty outer shipping box - this can only be used once per set of name, address, payment details.
..
4. Apple - MacBook 13inch - £1499 - empty box - exact same as the one above but under different details.
So I'm guessing he DOES refer to the "once per account" thingy after all
It states this, which Is not very clear as to what It relates to.
Quote:empty outer shipping box - this can only be used once per set of name, address, payment details.
An empty outer shipping box Is not a one-time exception. There's a lot of ambiguity In the post.
RE: Recent Successful SE’s with methods and info (UK) - Nabeshin - 04-22-2022
(04-22-2022, 01:08 PM)mothered Wrote:(04-22-2022, 12:49 PM)Nabeshin Wrote:Understood, but there's no mention of a "one-time exception".(04-22-2022, 10:53 AM)mothered Wrote: You'd be surprised.
I'm referring to just the one claim, namely this:
As said, there's no mention of a one-time exception and If that's the case, he was lucky to have a brain-dead rep approve the claim.
But he said:
1. Apple - iPhone 13 Pro 516gb - £1249 - Empty box (empty outer shipping box - this can only be used once per set of name, address, payment details.
..
4. Apple - MacBook 13inch - £1499 - empty box - exact same as the one above but under different details.
So I'm guessing he DOES refer to the "once per account" thingy after all
It states this, which Is not very clear as to what It relates to.
Quote:empty outer shipping box - this can only be used once per set of name, address, payment details.
An empty outer shipping box Is not a one-time exception. There's a lot of ambiguity In the post.
Agree on that, I hope he'll post the chats, I'm quite curious