+- Sinisterly (https://sinister.li)
+-- Forum: General (https://sinister.li/Forum-General)
+--- Forum: The Lounge (https://sinister.li/Forum-The-Lounge)
+---- Forum: Random Discussion (https://sinister.li/Forum-Random-Discussion)
+---- Thread: Noah's Ark Theme Park (/Thread-Noah-s-Ark-Theme-Park)
Pages:
1
2
RE: Noah's Ark Theme Park - insidious - 07-09-2016
(07-09-2016, 01:21 AM)Primitive Wrote:(07-09-2016, 01:19 AM)insidious15 Wrote:(07-09-2016, 12:03 AM)Jiggly Wrote: It would be interesting if it had real animals. Although, I wonder if that would then show impracticalities of the ark? Also, I wonder if there are tough restrictions about health and safety and what not.
I definitely think it would be impracticle. They would have to do a bunch more building to safeproof the ark and make sure there is enough room for every animal to live safely, or have somewhere offsite and only transport animals into the ark for the day. The ark itself already looks quite cramped, but the logistics of making it a zoo are downright impracticle I think.
If enough money is thrown at the project, anything is possible.
True, that is if they avoid bankruptcy from not making enough money from their 'zoo'. It already seems unpopular with certain types of people (like that Bill Nye Guy).
RE: Noah's Ark Theme Park - pvnk - 07-09-2016
(07-09-2016, 01:25 AM)insidious15 Wrote:You can't please everyone, but if you attract enough customers, then it doesnt really matter who doesn't like it SeaWorld is a good example.(07-09-2016, 01:21 AM)Primitive Wrote:(07-09-2016, 01:19 AM)insidious15 Wrote: I definitely think it would be impracticle. They would have to do a bunch more building to safeproof the ark and make sure there is enough room for every animal to live safely, or have somewhere offsite and only transport animals into the ark for the day. The ark itself already looks quite cramped, but the logistics of making it a zoo are downright impracticle I think.
If enough money is thrown at the project, anything is possible.
True, that is if they avoid bankruptcy from not making enough money from their 'zoo'. It already seems unpopular with certain types of people (like that Bill Nye Guy).
RE: Noah's Ark Theme Park - mothered - 07-09-2016
Irrespective of what It contains, just to see Its actual life-size would be very Interesting.
So yes, I would visit It.
RE: Noah's Ark Theme Park - Jiggly - 07-10-2016
(07-09-2016, 01:21 AM)Primitive Wrote:(07-09-2016, 01:19 AM)insidious15 Wrote:(07-09-2016, 12:03 AM)Jiggly Wrote: It would be interesting if it had real animals. Although, I wonder if that would then show impracticalities of the ark? Also, I wonder if there are tough restrictions about health and safety and what not.
I definitely think it would be impracticle. They would have to do a bunch more building to safeproof the ark and make sure there is enough room for every animal to live safely, or have somewhere offsite and only transport animals into the ark for the day. The ark itself already looks quite cramped, but the logistics of making it a zoo are downright impracticle I think.
If enough money is thrown at the project, anything is possible.
With the way it is now, maybe not. If it had been planned with live animals from the start, you probably would be quite right. Although, there's still restrictions on the proximity of certain animals with others and rules and guidelines. I wonder how they could meet those is such a closed environment.
(07-09-2016, 04:57 AM)mothered Wrote: Irrespective of what It contains, just to see Its actual life-size would be very Interesting.
So yes, I would visit It.
I think that would be the only reason I would visit it also. The curiosity of the thing. Same reason I watched that recent film about Noah.
RE: Noah's Ark Theme Park - mothered - 07-11-2016
(07-10-2016, 07:44 PM)Jiggly Wrote: I think that would be the only reason I would visit it also. The curiosity of the thing. Same reason I watched that recent film about Noah.
What would probably be of equal Interest to me, Is the viewing of the life-size "Titanic".
I watched the movie with Leonardo DiCaprio, and was very amazed at Its structure- being the year of when It sank In "1912". For It's time In that era, I think It was an Incredible piece of workmanship.
RE: Noah's Ark Theme Park - pvnk - 07-12-2016
(07-10-2016, 07:44 PM)Jiggly Wrote:Hollywood is a good representation of historical events. Yeah.(07-09-2016, 01:21 AM)Primitive Wrote:(07-09-2016, 01:19 AM)insidious15 Wrote: I definitely think it would be impracticle. They would have to do a bunch more building to safeproof the ark and make sure there is enough room for every animal to live safely, or have somewhere offsite and only transport animals into the ark for the day. The ark itself already looks quite cramped, but the logistics of making it a zoo are downright impracticle I think.
If enough money is thrown at the project, anything is possible.
With the way it is now, maybe not. If it had been planned with live animals from the start, you probably would be quite right. Although, there's still restrictions on the proximity of certain animals with others and rules and guidelines. I wonder how they could meet those is such a closed environment.
(07-09-2016, 04:57 AM)mothered Wrote: Irrespective of what It contains, just to see Its actual life-size would be very Interesting.
So yes, I would visit It.
I think that would be the only reason I would visit it also. The curiosity of the thing. Same reason I watched that recent film about Noah.
RE: Noah's Ark Theme Park - Jiggly - 07-12-2016
(07-12-2016, 01:42 AM)Primitive Wrote:(07-10-2016, 07:44 PM)Jiggly Wrote:Hollywood is a good representation of historical events. Yeah.(07-09-2016, 01:21 AM)Primitive Wrote: If enough money is thrown at the project, anything is possible.
With the way it is now, maybe not. If it had been planned with live animals from the start, you probably would be quite right. Although, there's still restrictions on the proximity of certain animals with others and rules and guidelines. I wonder how they could meet those is such a closed environment.
(07-09-2016, 04:57 AM)mothered Wrote: Irrespective of what It contains, just to see Its actual life-size would be very Interesting.
So yes, I would visit It.
I think that would be the only reason I would visit it also. The curiosity of the thing. Same reason I watched that recent film about Noah.
Obviously not. That wasn't what I was saying. I generally don't hold an interest in religion based stories or models etc. If you were to view it as a genre, it would not be one I would be drawn to. However, these examples happened to get my curiosity up, not about religion, but about them as independent things.
You nitpicker xD
RE: Noah's Ark Theme Park - mothered - 07-13-2016
(07-12-2016, 09:30 PM)Jiggly Wrote: However, these examples happened to get my curiosity up, not about religion, but about them as independent things.
Precisely this.
It's of no consequence "where and who" the representation stems from. Provided It's of Interest to me, that's all that matters.
RE: Noah's Ark Theme Park - Jiggly - 07-13-2016
(07-13-2016, 04:24 AM)mothered Wrote:(07-12-2016, 09:30 PM)Jiggly Wrote: However, these examples happened to get my curiosity up, not about religion, but about them as independent things.
Precisely this.
It's of no consequence "where and who" the representation stems from. Provided It's of Interest to me, that's all that matters.
As always, we seem to understand each other.
RE: Noah's Ark Theme Park - mothered - 07-14-2016
(07-13-2016, 08:58 PM)Jiggly Wrote: As always, we seem to understand each other.
Certainly so my friend.