+- Sinisterly (https://sinister.li)
+-- Forum: General (https://sinister.li/Forum-General)
+--- Forum: The Lounge (https://sinister.li/Forum-The-Lounge)
+---- Forum: Serious Discussion (https://sinister.li/Forum-Serious-Discussion)
+---- Thread: Debate on Evolution (/Thread-Debate-on-Evolution)
Pages:
1
2
RE: Debate on Evolution - m0dem - 12-09-2015
(12-09-2015, 02:30 AM)meow Wrote: You didn't educate yourself at all after my or Megan's posts... if your argument is a conversation between a reporter and biologist then you should probably study the subject a little more before trying to start a debate about it. It seems like all you did was google "biologist who doesn't believe in evolution" to make us look stupid.
You are wrong, I did educate myself, you just didn't see me do it.
And for your information, I did not Google "biologist who doesn't believe in evolution", I googled "creation genetics evolution" (you can check the search results if you'd like).
I hope you're satisfied.
RE: Debate on Evolution - Oni - 12-09-2015
I took Anthropology this semester and I still don't have a firm opinion on the matter. It is, however, still a theory.
RE: Debate on Evolution - Saikou - 12-09-2015
Here lads I have a couple of links for you:
http://www.gotquestions.org/anthropic-principle.html
http://www.conservapedia.com/Counterexamples_to_Evolution
RE: Debate on Evolution - Nil - 12-09-2015
(12-09-2015, 06:40 AM)Oni Wrote: I took Anthropology this semester and I still don't have a firm opinion on the matter. It is, however, still a theory.
Still a theory? As opposed to what?
Laws don't become theories and theories don't become laws. There's nothing further for a theory to become.