![]() |
|
LAN Server Though Two Routers? - Printable Version +- Sinisterly (https://sinister.li) +-- Forum: Computers (https://sinister.li/Forum-Computers) +--- Forum: Networking (https://sinister.li/Forum-Networking) +--- Thread: LAN Server Though Two Routers? (/Thread-LAN-Server-Though-Two-Routers) Pages:
1
2
|
RE: LAN Server Though Two Routers? - Nebulous - 12-05-2014 (12-05-2014, 12:07 AM)XSpidey Wrote: Make me? Seriously, what are you? A fucking toddler? You're no better than the fucktarded virus mafia skids that run around believing they're actually knowledgable because they can DDoS. Go learn something you harmless fuck. RE: LAN Server Though Two Routers? - Crypto Kitsune - 12-05-2014 Oh mighty troll spare me thou mighty flame of interwebs, much skill, such doge~ RE: LAN Server Though Two Routers? - roger_smith - 12-05-2014 (12-04-2014, 10:51 PM)TheMercenary Wrote: Yes, I could set it up as an AP, but I prefer the security and control of my own router. (Call me paranoid, but I don't like the idea of everyone that comes into my house being on the same network as my personal PC, and the shared folders I have for my other computers.) The main router for At&t is total garbage for for port forwarding and and services; they give you very little control. It's easier for me to just place the second router in DMZ and use its firewall instead. You should set it up so your personal machines are on the same network as the file server. From there, you can setup a second router/AP as a "guest" network. That's what I would do, any reason not to do it that way? RE: LAN Server Though Two Routers? - JzJad - 12-05-2014 Does the DMZ'd router get its connection through the first router? or do you have the internet connection completely split between the two? If its split i cant actually think of a way to loop that back besides setting it up publicly which at that point is just stupid and dangerous. RE: LAN Server Though Two Routers? - roger_smith - 12-05-2014 @TheMercenary you need to give us a better idea of your network design so we can sort it out for you. RE: LAN Server Though Two Routers? - JzJad - 12-05-2014 (12-05-2014, 05:55 AM)roger_smith Wrote: @TheMercenary you need to give us a better idea of your network design so we can sort it out for you. Exactly, also if you anything like me. WHY THE FUCK YOU LETTING PEOPLE ON YOUR NETWORK? Just get Commodo Firewall if you dont have one, and stop bagging down your network..... Buy a Dual Band Router too. RE: LAN Server Though Two Routers? - roger_smith - 12-05-2014 (12-05-2014, 06:05 AM)JzJad Wrote: Exactly, also if you anything like me. WHY THE FUCK YOU LETTING PEOPLE ON YOUR NETWORK? Just get Commodo Firewall if you dont have one, and stop bagging down your network..... Buy a Dual Band Router too. I'd tend to agree with this. I believe there's a better solution than the way you're going about it. Just snag the stuffs we need, and we'll get it all sorted out. RE: LAN Server Though Two Routers? - Eclipse - 12-05-2014 (12-04-2014, 10:45 PM)XSpidey Wrote: You clearly did not read what he asked. (facepalm) Go and research basic network topologies. RE: LAN Server Though Two Routers? - Skullmeat - 02-19-2015 Sorry it took so long. Been real busy. Essentially my network is like so: ![]() So, Router A has a gateway IP like 192.1.0.1, and assigns them from there, so other devices would be like so, 192.1.0.2, 192.1.0.3, and so on. So lets assume Router B has an IP of 192.1.0.4. To Router B, this is what it calls it's WAN IP. Now, Router B has a gateway IP of 192.2.0.1, and assigns them from there, so other devices behind it would be 192.2.0.2, 192.2.0.3, etc. So lets say I want to access my Samba server, which is behind Router A, with an assigned IP of 192.1.0.5. The machine I want to access it from, is behind Router B, with an assigned IP of 192.2.0.4. Problem is, it does not show up in the network map, At all, even though I can Ping Router A. |