Sinisterly
[Bored] looking for a new batch project - Printable Version

+- Sinisterly (https://sinister.li)
+-- Forum: Coding (https://sinister.li/Forum-Coding)
+--- Forum: Coding (https://sinister.li/Forum-Coding--71)
+--- Thread: [Bored] looking for a new batch project (/Thread-Bored-looking-for-a-new-batch-project)

Pages: 1 2 3


RE: [Bored] looking for a new batch project - ArkPhaze - 01-11-2014

(01-10-2014, 09:45 AM)upsurt Wrote:
(01-10-2014, 07:08 AM)ArkPhaze Wrote: So a C++ program (or a language of choice otherwise) that gets called via command line

no :Nerd:

(01-10-2014, 07:08 AM)ArkPhaze Wrote: since batch is not the language for this kind of project?

exactly for this reason :epic:

not too simple, you can spend some time and learn something new






or just calc fibonacci

My point was not that it's difficult, my point was that you can't really do it, without the conditions that I've made in the statement above. If you'd like to show us what you're talking about? Do you even know the limitations or capabilities of batch yourself?


RE: [Bored] looking for a new batch project - upsurt - 01-11-2014

quick & dirty

Code:
@echo off setlocal enabledelayedexpansion title ArkPhaze: "you can't really do it" set x=1 set y=0 set f=%y% for /l %%_ in (1,1,35) do (set /a z=x+y& set f=!f!,!z!& set /a x=y& set /a y=z) echo %f%



RE: [Bored] looking for a new batch project - ArkPhaze - 01-12-2014

(01-11-2014, 12:54 PM)upsurt Wrote: quick & dirty

Code:
@echo off setlocal enabledelayedexpansion title ArkPhaze: "you can't really do it" set x=1 set y=0 set f=%y% for /l %%_ in (1,1,35) do (set /a z=x+y& set f=!f!,!z!& set /a x=y& set /a y=z) echo %f%

That's not the full mining process, there's tons left out. How do you expect to do anything with those values?


RE: [Bored] looking for a new batch project - upsurt - 01-12-2014

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fibonacci_number

Sorry, I don't get what's wrong with you.
Go teach yourself. I'm not gone talk to you,
if you go on with that childish behavior.


RE: [Bored] looking for a new batch project - ArkPhaze - 01-12-2014

(01-12-2014, 12:15 PM)upsurt Wrote: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fibonacci_number

Sorry, I don't get what's wrong with you.
Go teach yourself. I'm not gone talk to you,
if you go on with that childish behavior.

I'm talking about downloading a blockchain along with the rest of the steps involved in bitcoin mining, such as pools and managing worker ID's. You're going to need other utilities that are invoked by batch in order to do this, is what I'm saying... You just don't seem to understand that, or you don't believe that batch has any limitations.. What I'm saying is not childish, it's the facts. You're just being too stubborn or ignorant to accept them.


RE: [Bored] looking for a new batch project - upsurt - 01-13-2014

Ok, sorry, I missunderstood something. I talked about Fibonacci in my last posts.
I know batch. but right, I don't know how exactly bitcoins are created. So, sorry for the confusion.
But you should not react like that. Explain it, instead of attacking other users.
Or you could just post an idea for a batch...


RE: [Bored] looking for a new batch project - SHADOW MAN - 01-13-2014

what about a antivirus?


RE: [Bored] looking for a new batch project - ArkPhaze - 01-13-2014

(01-13-2014, 12:11 AM)upsurt Wrote: Ok, sorry, I missunderstood something. I talked about Fibonacci in my last posts.
I know batch. but right, I don't know how exactly bitcoins are created. So, sorry for the confusion.
But you should not react like that. Explain it, instead of attacking other users.
Or you could just post an idea for a batch...

Do what I did then and create a recursive approach to the fib sequence. Smile That's a fun project.


RE: [Bored] looking for a new batch project - thinlight - 01-13-2014

@kevin Varga - I just learned far more about batch programming than I ever wanted to know thanks to your posting of that code. Maybe bitcoin mining is possible... !


RE: [Bored] looking for a new batch project - upsurt - 01-13-2014

"hack" and "virus" ... right ... :Not-Amused: :troll: