![]() |
|
How to be "Invisible" - Printable Version +- Sinisterly (https://sinister.li) +-- Forum: Hacking (https://sinister.li/Forum-Hacking) +--- Forum: Social Engineering (https://sinister.li/Forum-Social-Engineering) +--- Thread: How to be "Invisible" (/Thread-How-to-be-Invisible) |
RE: How to be "Invisible" - 1llusion - 02-26-2011 (01-28-2011, 11:01 AM)Crash_Override Wrote: Well a very detailed and great thread brother. (02-25-2011, 08:33 PM)Hidden Wrote: hahaha this is neat nice post. Thanks Really appreciate it!
RE: How to be "Invisible" - djthunda12123 - 02-27-2011 Well, nice tut. Its all about aggro! RE: How to be "Invisible" - 1llusion - 02-27-2011 (02-27-2011, 08:51 PM)djthunda12123 Wrote: Well, nice tut. Its all about aggro! Thanks actually yes if you think about it, its logical, imagine how much more brain capacity you would use if you would register every little detail
RE: How to be "Invisible" - FOOlafey - 02-27-2011 BEST THREAD! xD this is so funny! RE: How to be "Invisible" - 1llusion - 02-28-2011 (02-27-2011, 11:46 PM)FOOlafey Wrote: BEST THREAD! xD thanks glad you liked it
RE: How to be "Invisible" - sy4rul - 03-09-2011 lol.. great tuts... never think of better way to be invisble aka not attracting attraction unto.. ![]() attention sometime cause more trouble except from hot chix.. RE: How to be "Invisible" - 1llusion - 03-09-2011 (03-09-2011, 02:04 PM)sy4rul Wrote: lol.. great tuts... thanks ![]() well, hot chix cause even more trouble then attention xD RE: How to be "Invisible" - peterjoo77 - 03-10-2011 I totaly understand and agree with u RE: How to be "Invisible" - 1llusion - 03-10-2011 (03-10-2011, 03:01 PM)peterjoo77 Wrote: I totaly understand and agree with u Thank you a lot
RE: How to be "Invisible" - 1llusion - 03-12-2011 (03-12-2011, 06:32 AM)endTrance Wrote: One of my personal favorite hobbies is people watching, and one thing I have found is exactly as you said, be inconspicuous, another face in the crowd. Don't draw any attention to yourself, and you'll be amazed at what you'll see. But, just standing around... Well, you'll look pretty suspicious >> Besides, wouldn't the stationary targets be much easier to hit? In dodge ball, I mean. I had one person, who claimed he is a psychologist or something, to test this in professional area and to his surprise, it actually worked ![]() Well, yes in doge ball it would be much easier to hit the weak ones first, bu then you give more time to the good ones to hit you, so the most common tactic is to hit out the best ones first and then the weak ones
|