![]() |
|
Required posts to rep. - Printable Version +- Sinisterly (https://sinister.li) +-- Forum: General (https://sinister.li/Forum-General) +--- Forum: Announcements (https://sinister.li/Forum-Announcements) +---- Forum: Suggestions (https://sinister.li/Forum-Suggestions) +----- Forum: Old Suggestions (https://sinister.li/Forum-Old-Suggestions) +----- Thread: Required posts to rep. (/Thread-Required-posts-to-rep) Pages:
1
2
|
RE: Required posts to rep. - Fallen - 12-30-2013 Also, the correct terminology is repute. Not "rep". Just saying... RE: Required posts to rep. - Singularity - 12-30-2013 (12-30-2013, 04:36 AM)Fallen Wrote: Also, the correct terminology is repute. Not "rep". Well currently we are using the slang term. RE: Required posts to rep. - Eternal Minds - 12-30-2013 (12-30-2013, 04:31 AM)Singularity Wrote: read the thread you are posting on. Read what I posted earlier. I stated that regular members shouldn't be able to rep at all. RE: Required posts to rep. - Singularity - 12-30-2013 (12-30-2013, 04:38 AM)Eternal Minds Wrote: Read what I posted earlier. I stated that regular members shouldn't be able to rep at all. and I addressed the point. RE: Required posts to rep. - Silvinex - 12-30-2013 (12-30-2013, 04:38 AM)Eternal Minds Wrote: Read what I posted earlier. I stated that regular members shouldn't be able to rep at all. I do agree. Only upgraded members should be able to + or - rep. And regular members should only be allowed to neutral rep. RE: Required posts to rep. - Kyou - 12-30-2013 I have set it to 50 for now. Let's see how that goes. ~Locked |