![]() |
|
question about sealed box method - Printable Version +- Sinisterly (https://sinister.li) +-- Forum: Hacking (https://sinister.li/Forum-Hacking) +--- Forum: Social Engineering (https://sinister.li/Forum-Social-Engineering) +--- Thread: question about sealed box method (/Thread-question-about-sealed-box-method--195666) Pages:
1
2
|
RE: question about sealed box method - FortuneCookie4 - 07-14-2023 (07-13-2023, 07:38 PM)Nebber Wrote:(07-13-2023, 06:47 PM)FortuneCookie4 Wrote:(07-13-2023, 04:02 PM)Nebber Wrote: Alright thanks, I get you. So more or less not worth trying unless I’m able to use my own printer? Would of course test how long the ink takes to disappear first but just looking for the best method to stick too right now. Had a failed Amazon macbook refund recently when I returned the incorrect item so need to sort it out. good luck dude. keep us posted RE: question about sealed box method - DaturaEnjoyer - 07-14-2023 (07-14-2023, 11:55 AM)FortuneCookie4 Wrote:(07-13-2023, 07:38 PM)Nebber Wrote:(07-13-2023, 06:47 PM)FortuneCookie4 Wrote: It is a tricky one as it requires upfront cost and some trial runs to figure out how long it takes for the ink to disappear and time it with that particular carrier so they missed the relabelled window (e.g. once it is loaded onto the truck, not at the sorting plant) . Even when it is perfectly execute, there are still many variables we can't account for. And some retailers just downright refused to entertain LIT (amz do though). Hello, does anyone here know if CCTV cameras at the UPS store/post office are a problem, if you're using a boxing method? I'm about to deliver a fake package, and I'm worried that It'll be traced to me |