![]() |
|
A warning - police involved in DNA claim - Printable Version +- Sinisterly (https://sinister.li) +-- Forum: Hacking (https://sinister.li/Forum-Hacking) +--- Forum: Social Engineering (https://sinister.li/Forum-Social-Engineering) +--- Thread: A warning - police involved in DNA claim (/Thread-A-warning-police-involved-in-DNA-claim) Pages:
1
2
|
RE: A warning - police involved in DNA claim - contriveD - 12-14-2022 (12-12-2022, 07:21 PM)mcpvperz Wrote:(12-12-2022, 06:46 PM)Ashitbag Wrote: Can we get any level of detail regarding the value of the DNA'd item or the source -- particular business, or at least size of company supplying goods (large multinational, smaller company)?It wouldn't have been the company who issued the police, they have no power. It would've had to been the delivery service. Probably a case of it's constant that there's packages being lost on 1 address and it was flagged. I called the delivery company and informed them that the package had been found, but they just told me that their investigation is already completed and has been handed back over to the company. So the police investigation part seems to be initiated by the targeted company. It could also be the case that it had been initiated as a cause of the address being flagged. In the past, I had one other package which did not arrive. RE: A warning - police involved in DNA claim - 2ndround - 12-14-2022 (12-12-2022, 10:29 PM)Endeavor Wrote: This is why I know DNA is easiest but also the riskiest in my opinion. would say ltid/ftid is the most riskiest and someone here also shared that the police was involved. Good post. You claimed dna to the same address before. Was it a long time ago and with the same courier company if you can say? The awareness for refunding is definitely increasing and not suprisingly. There are a ton of artciles written this year by fraud prevention companies, banks, newspapers etc explaining all of the main techniques written about here. The journalists have done more research on the techniques than many posters on this forum. I mean it is obvious it will get harder when you think that refunding services can be done by anyone with an internet connection, some skills and a basic level of English. There are already Indian dudes offering refunding services on fiverr.com. Speaking of Indians, there was a post on a forum some years ago that they were approached by the Police for a dna. Involving the police, depends on the country, company and how genuine the claim is perceived to be, as well as previous history for that person/address? RE: A warning - police involved in DNA claim - mcpvperz - 12-14-2022 (12-14-2022, 05:08 PM)contriveD Wrote:That's really odd. Usually when a LP person finds out something sketchy about a person, they just ban them from their services (which would be your address), I've never heard of getting the police involved.(12-12-2022, 07:21 PM)mcpvperz Wrote:(12-12-2022, 06:46 PM)Ashitbag Wrote: Can we get any level of detail regarding the value of the DNA'd item or the source -- particular business, or at least size of company supplying goods (large multinational, smaller company)?It wouldn't have been the company who issued the police, they have no power. It would've had to been the delivery service. Probably a case of it's constant that there's packages being lost on 1 address and it was flagged. |