![]() |
|
Help me please - Printable Version +- Sinisterly (https://sinister.li) +-- Forum: Hacking (https://sinister.li/Forum-Hacking) +--- Forum: Social Engineering (https://sinister.li/Forum-Social-Engineering) +--- Thread: Help me please (/Thread-Help-me-please--158329) Pages:
1
2
|
RE: Help me please - Jesuspaysme - 03-09-2022 (03-09-2022, 05:39 AM)mothered Wrote:ftid relys on post person not being switched in really LIT doesn’t ?(03-09-2022, 05:01 AM)Jesuspaysme Wrote: I’m planning on using the water soluble LIT method have you tried this sir and your thoughts as I checked over your website and nothing about LIT mentioned :?Given the LIT Is a variant of the FTID, I don't support either of the two, hence I don't plan on writing a guide on the probability of Its success. RE: Help me please - mothered - 03-09-2022 (03-09-2022, 06:02 AM)Jesuspaysme Wrote: ftid relys on post person not being switched in really LIT doesn’t ?LIT Is also very similar. If the shipping label starts to fade while In storage, logic has It, It should be reprinted. If It completely fades, It shouldn't be marked as an unidentified consignment, but rather the label reprinted based on the Information on the carrier's manifest - weight & dimensions and package description. All that Is the responsibility of the person(s) handling the shipment, some of whom are brain-dead or can't be bothered doing their job as required - which Is why the LIT succeeds. RE: Help me please - Jesuspaysme - 03-09-2022 Yeah I was planning on using water solulable paper for the label so the ink doesn’t show any fading so by time it’s put in delivery Van and man comes back to check item the ice would of leaked through and melted the label so then would have no label on , instead of the ink method that just gets rid of writing leaving blank label which would surely lead to investigation , it would have no label and would lead it getting thrown out , have you heard of anyone using this LIT method before the water solulable way ? |