Sinisterly
[QUESTION] Why does FTID work? - Printable Version

+- Sinisterly (https://sinister.li)
+-- Forum: Hacking (https://sinister.li/Forum-Hacking)
+--- Forum: Social Engineering (https://sinister.li/Forum-Social-Engineering)
+--- Thread: [QUESTION] Why does FTID work? (/Thread-QUESTION-Why-does-FTID-work)

Pages: 1 2


RE: [QUESTION] Why does FTID work? - Rednaxela1 - 11-21-2020

(11-19-2020, 03:50 AM)mothered Wrote:
(11-18-2020, 06:49 PM)weaksauce Wrote: i'm guessing they photoshop a custom shipping label in some clever way?
Irrespective of how well the shipping label Is edited, the tracking number must show as delivered to the correct destination.

Given carriers work on a scanning system, the receiver's details on the label, has no relevance. In my line of work, I can assure you that the so-called flawed FTID method will fail on every occasion. There's no Ifs, ands, or buts about It. Our drivers scan packages at the collection point, and the same when It's dropped off at their depot. It's scanned again just before loading It Into their van and a final scan at the receiver's end. That "4 scans In total"- Impossible to bypass.

How are alot of people bypassing this then? I have seen multiple people sending screenshots of completed refunds, some of them costing thousands.


RE: [QUESTION] Why does FTID work? - mothered - 11-22-2020

(11-21-2020, 09:48 PM)Rednaxela1 Wrote: How are alot of people bypassing this then? I have seen multiple people sending screenshots of completed refunds, some of them costing thousands.
They're either not being truthful and edit the Images, or rely on the laziness and Incompetency of carriers and return centers/Inwards goods.

I've documented one method In my blog that has the "best chance" of succeeding, but by no means does It Indicate that "It will be successful".