![]() |
|
RTS Method - Printable Version +- Sinisterly (https://sinister.li) +-- Forum: Hacking (https://sinister.li/Forum-Hacking) +--- Forum: Social Engineering (https://sinister.li/Forum-Social-Engineering) +--- Thread: RTS Method (/Thread-RTS-Method--210490) Pages:
1
2
|
RTS Method - Rambo201 - 02-20-2024 I've done other methods for SEs such as DNA/EB/LIT and I know some are riskier than others. How does Manual RTS compare to FTID or Scans for example? As I would consider those two risky. RE: RTS Method - DontRunDontTrip - 02-20-2024 Dead at least for Amazon ----- RE: RTS Method - Anonimus - 02-20-2024 (02-20-2024, 08:24 PM)Rambo201 Wrote: I've done other methods for SEs such as DNA/EB/LIT and I know some are riskier than others. How does Manual RTS compare to FTID or Scans for example? As I would consider those two risky. Only works if you're dropping off shipping ups RE: RTS Method - Rambo201 - 02-21-2024 (02-20-2024, 10:54 PM)Anonimus Wrote:I've saw a lot for DPD mostly.(02-20-2024, 08:24 PM)Rambo201 Wrote: I've done other methods for SEs such as DNA/EB/LIT and I know some are riskier than others. How does Manual RTS compare to FTID or Scans for example? As I would consider those two risky. Is it any risker as a meth? Such as scans etc. RE: RTS Method - Anonimus - 02-21-2024 (02-21-2024, 02:50 PM)Rambo201 Wrote:(02-20-2024, 10:54 PM)Anonimus Wrote:I've saw a lot for DPD mostly.(02-20-2024, 08:24 PM)Rambo201 Wrote: I've done other methods for SEs such as DNA/EB/LIT and I know some are riskier than others. How does Manual RTS compare to FTID or Scans for example? As I would consider those two risky. You are engaging in fraud, everything has a risk here, it must be understood, but personally I have not yet noticed any dangerous situations with authorities after RTS RE: RTS Method - Rambo201 - 02-23-2024 (02-21-2024, 03:59 PM)Anonimus Wrote:Absolutely, that being said. Some methods are riskier than others and I wasn’t sure where RTS placed in that category as I’ve barely encountered it. However it is currently working on many stores.(02-21-2024, 02:50 PM)Rambo201 Wrote:(02-20-2024, 10:54 PM)Anonimus Wrote: Only works if you're dropping off shipping upsI've saw a lot for DPD mostly. RE: RTS Method - frankovec - 02-24-2024 (02-21-2024, 02:50 PM)Rambo201 Wrote:Meth is definitely riskier than SEing(02-20-2024, 10:54 PM)Anonimus Wrote:I've saw a lot for DPD mostly.(02-20-2024, 08:24 PM)Rambo201 Wrote: I've done other methods for SEs such as DNA/EB/LIT and I know some are riskier than others. How does Manual RTS compare to FTID or Scans for example? As I would consider those two risky. RE: RTS Method - Rambo201 - 02-25-2024 (02-24-2024, 07:29 AM)frankovec Wrote:(02-21-2024, 02:50 PM)Rambo201 Wrote:Meth is definitely riskier than SEing(02-20-2024, 10:54 PM)Anonimus Wrote: Only works if you're dropping off shipping upsI've saw a lot for DPD mostly. How unique! RE: RTS Method - TorUser827PlsNoBan - 02-26-2024 I hate to be that guy, but what is the RTS and DPD method? Return to sender? I can't even guess what DPD means. RE: RTS Method - Mong500n - 02-26-2024 (02-26-2024, 03:21 AM)TorUser827PlsNoBan Wrote: I hate to be that guy, but what is the RTS and DPD method? DPD is a courier in the UK, as you said, RTS is return to sender. |