+- Sinisterly (https://sinister.li)
+-- Forum: Hacking (https://sinister.li/Forum-Hacking)
+--- Forum: Social Engineering (https://sinister.li/Forum-Social-Engineering)
+--- Thread: Chargebacks (/Thread-Chargebacks)
Pages:
1
2
Chargebacks - 900back - 12-30-2019
Via PayPal when buying shit.
Any risks attached that I should know of?
RE: Chargebacks - RelaxedSE - 12-30-2019
You charge back with pay pal with the unauthorized charge method.
RE: Chargebacks - mothered - 12-30-2019
As far as PayPal Is concerned, your SE Is a legit claim.
Treat It as such by not demonstrating signs of Inconsistencies, and you'll have no Issues whatsoever.
RE: Chargebacks - 900back - 12-30-2019
Right, but wouldn’t the company I order from fight back since they will have proof they delivered the items?
RE: Chargebacks - mothered - 12-30-2019
(12-30-2019, 11:54 AM)900back Wrote: Right, but wouldn’t the company I order from fight back since they will have proof they delivered the items?
If you're using the DNA method, a package that's marked as delivered, by no means concludes that you personally received It.
Delivering a package to a given premises Is one thing, personally accepting It, Is a different story altogether.
RE: Chargebacks - 900back - 12-30-2019
Ok ty, but What if an unauthorised charge method is used like suggested above?
(12-30-2019, 11:54 AM)900back Wrote: Right, but wouldn’t the company I order from fight back since they will have proof they delivered the items?
RE: Chargebacks - Defeat - 12-30-2019
(12-30-2019, 01:12 PM)mothered Wrote:While true, I find that PayPal almost always sides with the seller if the package was signed for. I don't even think they care who signed for it. This is from personal experience. If it's just marked as delivered without a signature, you should have no problem op.(12-30-2019, 11:54 AM)900back Wrote: Right, but wouldn’t the company I order from fight back since they will have proof they delivered the items?
If you're using the DNA method, a package that's marked as delivered, by no means concludes that you personally received It.
Delivering a package to a given premises Is one thing, personally accepting It, Is a different story altogether.
RE: Chargebacks - mothered - 12-30-2019
(12-30-2019, 02:34 PM)Strait McCool Wrote:(12-30-2019, 01:12 PM)mothered Wrote:While true, I find that PayPal almost always sides with the seller if the package was signed for.(12-30-2019, 11:54 AM)900back Wrote: Right, but wouldn’t the company I order from fight back since they will have proof they delivered the items?
If you're using the DNA method, a package that's marked as delivered, by no means concludes that you personally received It.
Delivering a package to a given premises Is one thing, personally accepting It, Is a different story altogether.
I certainly agree, and have personally experienced It numerous times.
That's when I put my above statement Into effect, by manipulating and convincing them that I did not receive my package, nor did the signature on the carrier's manifest belong to me. It wasn't a straightforward SE with PayPal, but I eventually got there In the end.
RE: Chargebacks - Rednaxela1 - 12-31-2019
(12-30-2019, 10:26 AM)RelaxedSE Wrote: You charge back with pay pal with the unauthorized charge method.
Does this always work? What does it entail?
RE: Chargebacks - mothered - 12-31-2019
(12-31-2019, 02:04 AM)Rednaxela1 Wrote:(12-30-2019, 10:26 AM)RelaxedSE Wrote: You charge back with pay pal with the unauthorized charge method.
Does this always work? What does it entail?
As It Implies, you simply claim that the charge/transaction on the account was not authorized by you.
You then dispute It with the Intention of obtaining a refund.