RE: need some suggestion 09-01-2012, 08:09 PM
#11
| need some suggestion filter_list | |
![[+]](https://sinister.li/images/modern/collapse_collapsed.png)
RE: need some suggestion 09-03-2012, 09:37 AM
#12
(09-01-2012, 08:09 PM)Anima Templi Wrote:(08-31-2012, 05:24 PM)h4r0015k Wrote: BumP!
.........................
?????
I'm using the latest version of Firefox.
it should work in firefox..can you try again..
![[Image: fow57.jpg]](http://i.imgur.com/fow57.jpg)
RE: need some suggestion 09-03-2012, 10:13 AM
#13
I don't know what to suggest because I just tried it and it doesnt work at all. Even typing the example that you have given does nothing. Maybe you could start there.
Just my thoughts no harm intended.
Just my thoughts no harm intended.
RE: need some suggestion 09-03-2012, 11:36 AM
#14
(09-03-2012, 10:13 AM)njoshie Wrote: I don't know what to suggest because I just tried it and it doesnt work at all. Even typing the example that you have given does nothing. Maybe you could start there.
Just my thoughts no harm intended.
thanks for the reply..can you tell me which browser are you using ... and can you visit here
Code:
http://www.cambiaresearch.com/articles/15/javascript-char-codes-key-codestell me number for equal sign..
RE: need some suggestion 09-04-2012, 08:00 AM
#15
Quite a few things wrong that I see with the code you have.
The "Element" object does not have value in it's prototype by default, nor do you modify it's prototype. Element is what is returned when you call something like "document.getObjectById('first')", you are better off using a built in DOM manipulation function that can modify the inner html.
Also, not quite sure why you chose to keep your processing data within header tags, an input field seems like it would be more suitable for storing user input. The hidden="hidden" XHTML quirk isn't supposed to work the way you are using it, and doesn't work that way everywhere. A hidden input type is intended exactly for what you are trying to do there.
The "Element" object does not have value in it's prototype by default, nor do you modify it's prototype. Element is what is returned when you call something like "document.getObjectById('first')", you are better off using a built in DOM manipulation function that can modify the inner html.
Also, not quite sure why you chose to keep your processing data within header tags, an input field seems like it would be more suitable for storing user input. The hidden="hidden" XHTML quirk isn't supposed to work the way you are using it, and doesn't work that way everywhere. A hidden input type is intended exactly for what you are trying to do there.
RE: need some suggestion 09-04-2012, 08:15 AM
#16
(09-04-2012, 08:00 AM)slbmeh Wrote: Quite a few things wrong that I see with the code you have.
The "Element" object does not have value in it's prototype by default, nor do you modify it's prototype. Element is what is returned when you call something like "document.getObjectById('first')", you are better off using a built in DOM manipulation function that can modify the inner html.
Also, not quite sure why you chose to keep your processing data within header tags, an input field seems like it would be more suitable for storing user input. The hidden="hidden" XHTML quirk isn't supposed to work the way you are using it, and doesn't work that way everywhere. A hidden input type is intended exactly for what you are trying to do there.
thanks for you reply...
