[Queen]

I have no idea why anyone thinks that you do. vote^^

[Red_SF]

Absolutely not and people who judge based on that fact are morons to be fair.

[Saika]

Absolutely not and people who judge based on that fact are morons to be fair.

^^^
I agree on this

[Sirius]

No. It just looks more professional and mature, nothing related to intelligence.

[m0rtar]

It's always funny when there's a grammar argument in the YT comments.

[Jebusfathead]

Nope, that's like saying you need a hat to be an apple, makes no sense

[Cakey]

Nope, that's like saying you need a hat to be an apple, makes no sense

You do need a hat to be an apple though.

[Wit]

I would say being intelligent has a part in having grammar, without grammar and many other components, how can you say you are intelligent. If you are going to call yourself intelligent, you should be able to know how to spell, placement of punctuation marks, etc.

[Jacob_mybb_import13674]

I would say being intelligent has a part in having grammar, without grammar and many other components, how can you say you are intelligent. If you are going to call yourself intelligent, you should be able to know how to spell, placement of punctuation marks, etc.

This.

If you're ignorant, you can misspell words quite often and just mess everything up.

If you're intelligent, you either type with good grammar or sub-par grammar.

[Silence]

I wouldn't say grammar is a requisite for intelligence. Intelligence can be a lot of different things actually - for you can be intelligent in one field, say math; yet poor in another field, say english. So, no - I don't feel that Grammar is needed to be intelligent. (Before someone says something I am actually somewhat intelligent with an IQ of 135).