Login Register




The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.


car parts - which method? filter_list
Author
Message
RE: car parts - which method? #16
(11-02-2022, 11:51 AM)drunnnkz Wrote: I think it is a legally binding, but please see below: https://ibb.co/CHNQVCP
Countless SE'ers have signed that type of document without Issues.

There's no declaration, affirmation and nothing of the sort to verify that what you're saying Is true and correct to the best of your knowledge - which Is what holds ground with legally binding documents. All they're stating Is "legally binding declaration" without anything supporting It.
[Image: AD83g1A.png]

Reply





Messages In This Thread
car parts - which method? - by RoyalRefunding - 10-29-2022, 01:49 PM
RE: car parts - which method? - by mothered - 10-29-2022, 03:16 PM
RE: car parts - which method? - by K03NT3S31N - 10-29-2022, 04:37 PM
RE: car parts - which method? - by mothered - 10-30-2022, 01:14 AM
RE: car parts - which method? - by elemenowpee - 10-30-2022, 04:32 AM
RE: car parts - which method? - by RoyalRefunding - 10-30-2022, 11:04 AM
RE: car parts - which method? - by mothered - 10-30-2022, 11:31 AM
RE: car parts - which method? - by RoyalRefunding - 10-30-2022, 12:05 PM
RE: car parts - which method? - by mothered - 10-30-2022, 03:01 PM
RE: car parts - which method? - by RoyalRefunding - 11-01-2022, 06:17 PM
RE: car parts - which method? - by mcpvperz - 11-01-2022, 07:37 PM
RE: car parts - which method? - by mothered - 11-02-2022, 01:49 AM
RE: car parts - which method? - by RoyalRefunding - 11-02-2022, 11:29 AM
RE: car parts - which method? - by mothered - 11-02-2022, 11:37 AM
RE: car parts - which method? - by RoyalRefunding - 11-02-2022, 11:51 AM
RE: car parts - which method? - by mothered - 11-02-2022, 12:03 PM