Seven Years of Service
Posts: 17
Threads: 3
best protection possible 04-25-2020, 07:29 PM
#1
Hello all, its been a long time since I have been here and I am in a hurry bc of some opsec and infosec problems and even more potential problems. I am a skip trace/facilitator/finder/buyer/etc. of anything for that which others seek but, I am also like that kick ass race car driving savant, yet automotive retard who doesn't know a spark plug from a butt plug or even why either exists. What I need to know is this...I will be running Tails "through" my old Dell inspiron 3000 laptop w/w10 or win7 bc I have heard that win7 is better security. Is it practical to place a vm on tails, and a vpn for extra measure or am i farting in the wind wasting $ and time on redundancy and maybe incompatibility?. I no longer have my mentor around to design/build/assemble the boxes "for the retard" and i took it for granted he would always b around. If $ is no object will you guys produce for me a build sheet of hw and sw to make an impregnable fool proof/idiot proof bad ass machina. Bc I am a stupid unlearning fuckwit my last one was shot up like swiss cheese and then jackbooted for good measure. HELP PLEASE!!!
I've upped my standards so, up yours!
•
Nine Years of Service
Posts: 3,093
Threads: 132
RE: best protection possible 04-26-2020, 12:57 AM
#2
Tails is a good OS for privacy. Qubes is overkill and uses too many resources.
Running a VPN might be a good idea. Even though all traffic is routed through Tor, a VPN will add another layer of needed protection. But be warned, if you have slow internet or get a bad connection, a VPN and Tor at the same time can be very slow.
I wouldn't recommend running an OS on a VM anymore. Especially if you're going for privacy. It's possible to detect if you are running a VM or not. There are tons of cheap USBs online. But if you do use a VM, use Windows 10. Windows 7 should NOT be used if you want security. It's not supported by Microsoft anymore.
•
Seven Years of Service
Posts: 17
Threads: 3
RE: best protection possible 04-26-2020, 02:14 PM
#4
hey drako, much thanks for the response and the advice. but, I got2 ask, if not Qube, is there another or really no need, or is Tails capable enough for everything . Are their weaknesses that I need yo know about?
I've upped my standards so, up yours!
•
Seven Years of Service
Posts: 17
Threads: 3
RE: best protection possible 04-26-2020, 03:15 PM
#5
i'm currently running Trust Zone on my rig and mobile...any opinion on TZ? only knock I've heard is the customer service but, I've never needed their help and I really like all the choices by countries an cities to choose for the outbound and the unlimited manual switching. wish I could turn off the geolocations permanently though...sure would solve some things and relieve some anxieties...also, not sure how to run one over the other, since I already have TZ on the puter and cell, do I just add another VPN once I am on Tor from Tor that only runs when I'm aboard? or can they run concurrently?, I'm confused...
I've upped my standards so, up yours!
•
Six Years of Service
Posts: 7
Threads: 0
RE: best protection possible 04-27-2020, 09:11 PM
#6
I reccomend you use Trisquel OS, or Tails OS.
•
Fourteen Years of Service
Posts: 74,291
Threads: 317
RE: best protection possible 04-28-2020, 05:17 AM
#7
Do note that In terms of your overall protection, there Is a distinction between "privacy" and "anonymity".
* Privacy: Not being able to "see" what you're doing.
* Anonymity: Not being able to "Identify" you.
Each one should be considered, configured and applied separately.
•
Seven Years of Service
Posts: 17
Threads: 3
RE: best protection possible 04-29-2020, 07:13 PM
#8
(04-27-2020, 09:11 PM)SeychellesTorGuardNode Wrote: I reccomend you use Trisquel OS, or Tails OS.
thx for the help
hadn't heard of Trisquel but, looking into it and I already like the Linux connection
(04-28-2020, 05:17 AM)mothered Wrote: Do note that In terms of your overall protection, there Is a distinction between "privacy" and "anonymity".
* Privacy: Not being able to "see" what you're doing.
* Anonymity: Not being able to "Identify" you.
Each one should be considered, configured and applied separately.
absolutely, with heavy emphasis on the latter...at least for me...however a privacy face is also useful as well
(This post was last modified: 04-29-2020, 07:21 PM by sofbal3b.)
I've upped my standards so, up yours!
•