[unnamed]

I respect your opinion, however..
1. I never said the Bible turns anybody to a saint, I said "I'm" not the type.
2. "Such as" writings that have been proven by time to coincide with writings from other times, now can these people from different places and times have "guessed" the same things? I don't think so.
3. Believing is different as you say, but how come "science" hasn't been able to prove that God doesn't exist? Evolution? Pfft, so some primates "decided" and "chose" to not evolve over time? With all the science "observation", etc. they haven't been able to prove this either? And how about the proof and facts? If we did evolve then surely "science" would have found differences in fossil densities over time right? Find the missing link right? WRONG, guess what, they haven't and won't. This is one topic where we can go forever discussing, but the important thing is that no matter what you believe in, then it's your right. I'm not talking about religion here, I'm talking about God.

1. Neither you or the bible can turn anyone in a saint, I suspect is quite the opposite in fact.
2. You're providing me nothing, I want to see what you're talking about.
3. First of all, how come Bible hasn't proven unicorns don't exist? Simply because you can't disprove something that doesn't exist. Secondly, this "If a proposition has not been disproven, then it cannot be considered false and must therefore be considered true." is a logical fallacy, just because something isn't disproven doesn't mean it does exist.You can read more about it here.

Evolution is a scientific fact and there is overwhelming evidence that suggests it.Of course, you'll go ahead and believe Earth is 6,000 years, because a shitty book told you so.

Of course everyone has the right to believe in anything he wants, I completely support it, that doesn't mean religion isn't nonsense.

[unnamed]

I respect your opinion, however..
1. I never said the Bible turns anybody to a saint, I said "I'm" not the type.
2. "Such as" writings that have been proven by time to coincide with writings from other times, now can these people from different places and times have "guessed" the same things? I don't think so.
3. Believing is different as you say, but how come "science" hasn't been able to prove that God doesn't exist? Evolution? Pfft, so some primates "decided" and "chose" to not evolve over time? With all the science "observation", etc. they haven't been able to prove this either? And how about the proof and facts? If we did evolve then surely "science" would have found differences in fossil densities over time right? Find the missing link right? WRONG, guess what, they haven't and won't. This is one topic where we can go forever discussing, but the important thing is that no matter what you believe in, then it's your right. I'm not talking about religion here, I'm talking about God.

1. Neither you or the bible can turn anyone in a saint, I suspect is quite the opposite in fact.
2. You're providing me nothing, I want to see what you're talking about.
3. First of all, how come Bible hasn't proven unicorns don't exist? Simply because you can't disprove something that doesn't exist. Secondly, this "If a proposition has not been disproven, then it cannot be considered false and must therefore be considered true." is a logical fallacy, just because something isn't disproven doesn't mean it does exist.You can read more about it here.

Evolution is a scientific fact and there is overwhelming evidence that suggests it.Of course, you'll go ahead and believe Earth is 6,000 years, because a shitty book told you so.

Of course everyone has the right to believe in anything he wants, I completely support it, that doesn't mean religion isn't nonsense.

[Maravilla]

1. You suspect very wrong, we all have a choice.
2. So you choose to believe in a "theory" that if its right then undoubtedly we would have found proof of this change in the model creation or evolution, for decades, evolutionists have searched for fossils of these links to prove the creation model wrong. Although millions of fossils have been unearthed, even evolutionists acknowledge that the links have not been found? Keep waiting then I guess.
3.Same can be said for science, it doesn't mean it doesn't exist either. Here's the thing, we can't prove one or the other, but we believers don't spend our life trying to prove something wrong, we just believe in our faith, unlike science which seems to be always one step behind in God's way, never ever finding what they forever have looked for, we found God, because he found us first, that's good enough for us.
If a fair maiden kisses a frog which instantly changes into a handsome prince, we would call it a fairy tale. But if the frog takes 40 million years to turn into a prince, we call it evolution. Time is the evolutionist's magic wand. Fairy tales come in many forms!

[Maravilla]

1. You suspect very wrong, we all have a choice.
2. So you choose to believe in a "theory" that if its right then undoubtedly we would have found proof of this change in the model creation or evolution, for decades, evolutionists have searched for fossils of these links to prove the creation model wrong. Although millions of fossils have been unearthed, even evolutionists acknowledge that the links have not been found? Keep waiting then I guess.
3.Same can be said for science, it doesn't mean it doesn't exist either. Here's the thing, we can't prove one or the other, but we believers don't spend our life trying to prove something wrong, we just believe in our faith, unlike science which seems to be always one step behind in God's way, never ever finding what they forever have looked for, we found God, because he found us first, that's good enough for us.
If a fair maiden kisses a frog which instantly changes into a handsome prince, we would call it a fairy tale. But if the frog takes 40 million years to turn into a prince, we call it evolution. Time is the evolutionist's magic wand. Fairy tales come in many forms!

[unnamed]

1. You suspect very wrong, we all have a choice.
2. So you choose to believe in a "theory" that if its right then undoubtedly we would have found proof of this change in the model creation or evolution, for decades, evolutionists have searched for fossils of these links to prove the creation model wrong. Although millions of fossils have been unearthed, even evolutionists acknowledge that the links have not been found? Keep waiting then I guess.
3.Same can be said for science, it doesn't mean it doesn't exist either. Here's the thing, we can't prove one or the other, but we believers don't spend our life trying to prove something wrong, we just believe in our faith, unlike science which seems to be always one step behind in God's way, never ever finding what they forever have looked for, we found God, because he found us first, that's good enough for us.
If a fair maiden kisses a frog which instantly changes into a handsome prince, we would call it a fairy tale. But if the frog takes 40 million years to turn into a prince, we call it evolution. Time is the evolutionist's magic wand. Fairy tales come in many forms!

Let me quote wikipedia on what "theory" means in science:

A scientific theory is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world, based on knowledge that has been repeatedly confirmed through observation and experimentation. Scientists create scientific theories from hypotheses that have been corroborated through the scientific method, then gather evidence to test their accuracy. As with all forms of scientific knowledge, scientific theories are inductive in nature and aim for predictive and explanatory force.

I also explained earlier that the scientific process is.

Here's the thing what? I never stated that God doesn't exist, neither "science" claims to say God doesn't exist.You're evading the argument.You stated that with love and repent you will get forgiven which couldn't be more wrong, all you need according to your book is holy liquid.

As far as the "frog story", sounds sweet and romantic but irrelevant to "evolution"

[unnamed]

1. You suspect very wrong, we all have a choice.
2. So you choose to believe in a "theory" that if its right then undoubtedly we would have found proof of this change in the model creation or evolution, for decades, evolutionists have searched for fossils of these links to prove the creation model wrong. Although millions of fossils have been unearthed, even evolutionists acknowledge that the links have not been found? Keep waiting then I guess.
3.Same can be said for science, it doesn't mean it doesn't exist either. Here's the thing, we can't prove one or the other, but we believers don't spend our life trying to prove something wrong, we just believe in our faith, unlike science which seems to be always one step behind in God's way, never ever finding what they forever have looked for, we found God, because he found us first, that's good enough for us.
If a fair maiden kisses a frog which instantly changes into a handsome prince, we would call it a fairy tale. But if the frog takes 40 million years to turn into a prince, we call it evolution. Time is the evolutionist's magic wand. Fairy tales come in many forms!

Let me quote wikipedia on what "theory" means in science:

A scientific theory is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world, based on knowledge that has been repeatedly confirmed through observation and experimentation. Scientists create scientific theories from hypotheses that have been corroborated through the scientific method, then gather evidence to test their accuracy. As with all forms of scientific knowledge, scientific theories are inductive in nature and aim for predictive and explanatory force.

I also explained earlier that the scientific process is.

Here's the thing what? I never stated that God doesn't exist, neither "science" claims to say God doesn't exist.You're evading the argument.You stated that with love and repent you will get forgiven which couldn't be more wrong, all you need according to your book is holy liquid.

As far as the "frog story", sounds sweet and romantic but irrelevant to "evolution"

[The Real Slim Shady]

1. You suspect very wrong, we all have a choice.
2. So you choose to believe in a "theory" that if its right then undoubtedly we would have found proof of this change in the model creation or evolution, for decades, evolutionists have searched for fossils of these links to prove the creation model wrong. Although millions of fossils have been unearthed, even evolutionists acknowledge that the links have not been found? Keep waiting then I guess.
3.Same can be said for science, it doesn't mean it doesn't exist either. Here's the thing, we can't prove one or the other, but we believers don't spend our life trying to prove something wrong, we just believe in our faith, unlike science which seems to be always one step behind in God's way, never ever finding what they forever have looked for, we found God, because he found us first, that's good enough for us.
If a fair maiden kisses a frog which instantly changes into a handsome prince, we would call it a fairy tale. But if the frog takes 40 million years to turn into a prince, we call it evolution. Time is the evolutionist's magic wand. Fairy tales come in many forms!

Lets break it down. You read a book and believe its factual information.

Ive got some more books for you to read:


Jack and the Giant Beanstock
Pinocchio
Princess and the Frog
The Gingerbread Man
The Little Mermaid

They are all very true stories. And you're going to trust that they are because I told you. Its not like you would use any personal intuition or critical analysis' to come to any other conclusion right.

[The Real Slim Shady]

1. You suspect very wrong, we all have a choice.
2. So you choose to believe in a "theory" that if its right then undoubtedly we would have found proof of this change in the model creation or evolution, for decades, evolutionists have searched for fossils of these links to prove the creation model wrong. Although millions of fossils have been unearthed, even evolutionists acknowledge that the links have not been found? Keep waiting then I guess.
3.Same can be said for science, it doesn't mean it doesn't exist either. Here's the thing, we can't prove one or the other, but we believers don't spend our life trying to prove something wrong, we just believe in our faith, unlike science which seems to be always one step behind in God's way, never ever finding what they forever have looked for, we found God, because he found us first, that's good enough for us.
If a fair maiden kisses a frog which instantly changes into a handsome prince, we would call it a fairy tale. But if the frog takes 40 million years to turn into a prince, we call it evolution. Time is the evolutionist's magic wand. Fairy tales come in many forms!

Lets break it down. You read a book and believe its factual information.

Ive got some more books for you to read:


Jack and the Giant Beanstock
Pinocchio
Princess and the Frog
The Gingerbread Man
The Little Mermaid

They are all very true stories. And you're going to trust that they are because I told you. Its not like you would use any personal intuition or critical analysis' to come to any other conclusion right.

[Maravilla]

Here's another fairy tale book:
On the origin of species..
Written by a man who got everything wrong.

---

Hmm? According to Darwin if I really want to breath underwater all I have to do is throw myself to the ocean since my genes will tell me I need to evolve gills, glub..glub..gl...LOL

[Maravilla]

Here's another fairy tale book:
On the origin of species..
Written by a man who got everything wrong.

---

Hmm? According to Darwin if I really want to breath underwater all I have to do is throw myself to the ocean since my genes will tell me I need to evolve gills, glub..glub..gl...LOL