Twelve Years of Service
Posts: 2,762
Threads: 58
RE: Water Has Consciousness... 12-03-2015, 01:43 AM
#2
You're joking, right? Like seriously?
•
Ten Years of Service
Posts: 732
Threads: 37
RE: Water Has Consciousness... 12-03-2015, 01:47 AM
#3
Yes, because H2O is an intelligent life form and actually has a consciousness.
Can't tell if trolling or is genuinely retarded...
•
Ten Years of Service
Posts: 20
Threads: 2
RE: Water Has Consciousness... 12-03-2015, 02:23 AM
#4
Worded improperly, I guess I shouldn't say HAS consciousness, but RESPONDS to consciousness. Better.
Let's remember to bash it and ridicule before researching on our own. Surely you've seen the studies done by Harvard of the Placebo Effect actually Curing diseases? Ok there's your stepping stone .... Consciousness has power.. Now, look into delta waves, theta waves, different brain waves and what they would do if beamed through Sand particles- to SHOW the Vibration Patterns...
Now, Use specific patterns (generated by specific emotions) to structure the molecules in your body (the end result, as most our body is water)
Try the Rice Experiment at home.
Look everything up I just said. I had the Harvard studies saved, have to re-locate them. Easy.
Also, ever heard of plant responding to music? Only positive music though, I did the tests I'm a huge greenthumb.
Babies responding to positive frequencies.
Meditation studies, random number generator studies - effected by consciousness...
This stuff has been floating around with documentation and studies for a long time I'm actually shocked some people still have NO CLUE about it whatsoever.
(This post was last modified: 12-03-2015, 02:25 AM by aviationplaystation.)
•
Twelve Years of Service
Posts: 2,762
Threads: 58
RE: Water Has Consciousness... 12-03-2015, 08:03 PM
#8
I'll edit this or add another post when I get home, buttttttttt.....
If we're thinking of the same study, that study stated that while it (the placebo) was less effective if at all effect in improving lung function in those who received it, compared to Albuterol, what it said is that the participants equally felt or perceived that they felt better as with Albuterol.
It did not actually improve their lung function as Albuterol did.
Ergo, saying it "cures" diseases is a bit much of an overstatement.
Additionally, you're comparing the power of perception and belief with that of actual consciousness, as though they hold the same.
So far you haven't posted any credible sources or peer reviewed documents favouring this as true.
Even the Wikipedia page you linked stated that the originator of this theory did not publish in peer reviewed journals, and that his studies may have been intentionally flawed to get a positive outcome.
•