RE: 2FA 01-18-2021, 05:33 PM
#11
I understand not everyone is interested in this. If added, would obviously be 100% optional to use.
If added, it would likely be the Google/Authy kind of 2FA.
(01-17-2021, 07:53 PM)6ix Wrote:(01-17-2021, 04:21 PM)green314 Wrote:(01-17-2021, 03:19 PM)mothered Wrote: I suggested It on my blog, not based on personal choice.
As said, It's not convenient. I prefer to simply enter a password and be done with It.(01-17-2021, 03:25 PM)fsociety Wrote: i will never use 2fa on forum... i use strong passwords even it got breach doesnt care...i dont use personal email on forum...even you get hacked.... doesnt matter...but making strong password , hope sinister is using password encryption like mds5 + salt if no salt and weak lenght password than easily crack you accounts.I don't use personal email or weak password either.
I don't get why you dislike the 2FA, in my opinion is a true shield against people who wants to have access to your account. Anyway, as you prefer.
Imo 2FA is great in concept, but just depends on what type is implemented.
2FA with phone number is just vulnerable to sim swap, so it provides a liiittle extra security if the attackers don't have that much interest in getting into your account.
But if they do your security is just in the hands of some Verizon Employee that couldn't care less, as proven many many times.
If added, it would likely be the Google/Authy kind of 2FA.











![[Image: 7ajmN5P.jpg]](https://i.imgur.com/7ajmN5P.jpg)
![[+]](https://sinister.li/images/modern/collapse_collapsed.png)
















![[Image: 4GNsK67.png]](http://i.imgur.com/4GNsK67.png)







![[Image: e91-1.png]](https://i.ibb.co/VHj0yMD/e91-1.png)