Login Register






Undecided 2FA filter_list
Author
Message
RE: 2FA #11
I understand not everyone is interested in this. If added, would obviously be 100% optional to use.

(01-17-2021, 07:53 PM)6ix Wrote:
(01-17-2021, 04:21 PM)green314 Wrote:
(01-17-2021, 03:19 PM)mothered Wrote: I suggested It on my blog, not based on personal choice.

As said, It's not convenient. I prefer to simply enter a password and be done  with It.
(01-17-2021, 03:25 PM)fsociety Wrote: i will never use 2fa on forum... i use strong passwords even it got breach doesnt care...i dont use personal email on forum...even you get hacked.... doesnt matter...but making strong password , hope sinister is using password encryption like mds5 + salt if no salt and weak lenght password than easily crack you accounts.
I don't use personal email or weak password either.
I don't get why you dislike the 2FA, in my opinion is a true shield against people who wants to have access to your account. Anyway, as you prefer.

Imo 2FA is great in concept, but just depends on what type is implemented.
2FA with phone number is just vulnerable to sim swap, so it provides a liiittle extra security if the attackers don't have that much interest in getting into your account.
But if they do your security is just in the hands of some Verizon Employee that couldn't care less, as proven many many times.

If added, it would likely be the Google/Authy kind of 2FA.
[Image: 7ajmN5P.jpg]

Telegram: Oni_SL (Link)

[+] 2 users Like Oni's post

RE: 2FA #12
(01-18-2021, 05:33 PM)Oni Wrote: I understand not everyone is interested in this. If added, would obviously be 100% optional to use.

(01-17-2021, 07:53 PM)6ix Wrote:
(01-17-2021, 04:21 PM)green314 Wrote: I don't use personal email or weak password either.
I don't get why you dislike the 2FA, in my opinion is a true shield against people who wants to have access to your account. Anyway, as you prefer.

Imo 2FA is great in concept, but just depends on what type is implemented.
2FA with phone number is just vulnerable to sim swap, so it provides a liiittle extra security if the attackers don't have that much interest in getting into your account.
But if they do your security is just in the hands of some Verizon Employee that couldn't care less, as proven many many times.

If added, it would likely be the Google/Authy kind of 2FA.

That sounds good actually! Would be good to see further interest.
[Image: 4GNsK67.png]


RE: 2FA #13
Haven't forgotten about this, still very possible.
[Image: 7ajmN5P.jpg]

Telegram: Oni_SL (Link)


RE: 2FA #14
No reason not to be in favour of an extra layer of security for your account, especially when it is optional to activate and deactive. If this gets implemented, I would highly recommend members utilizing the Authy application over the Google Authenticator application, as Authy can sync the codes across devices and is more facile to backup.
Best Regards,
UFCFAN47


RE: 2FA #15
There exists a plugin for 2FA that I looked at, but it does not work to my satisfaction. It would add your secret key, without you scanning it. This means you could potentially lose entire access if done improperly.

This might not be done for quite some time, as we'll have to make our own plugin or modify the existing one.

(02-04-2021, 01:04 PM)UFCFAN47 Wrote: No reason not to be in favour of an extra layer of security for your account, especially when it is optional to activate and deactive. If this gets implemented, I would highly recommend members utilizing the Authy application over the Google Authenticator application, as Authy can sync the codes across devices and is more facile to backup.

I also recommend Authy.
[Image: 7ajmN5P.jpg]

Telegram: Oni_SL (Link)


RE: 2FA #16
(02-09-2021, 10:02 AM)Oni Wrote: There exists a plugin for 2FA that I looked at, but it does not work to my satisfaction. It would add your secret key, without you scanning it. This means you could potentially lose entire access if done improperly.

This might not be done for quite some time, as we'll have to make our own plugin or modify the existing one.
If you will have to do your own plugin from scratch thus invest time on it, let's do this just if I'm not the only user who demand the 2FA but there are also other interested users. I don't want to be a burden for you guys to your tasks which allow the forum continue to work properly.


RE: 2FA #17
I'd like to bump this suggestion if possible, new points of view may be useful, please share. Thank you.


RE: 2FA #18
mind boggling this isnt implemented.

could we please get this as an option please its been 2 years since this thread was made
contact me on telegram
session 055d2fbdf2eae57dc6fab8918d91596bc1e1a00a8d299093dbb844c7fd0ad5580b
matrix securityai:matrix.org


RE: 2FA #19
(01-16-2021, 06:11 PM)green314 Wrote: I would like to set the 2FA (I am sure all of you know what is it) for my account here on sinister.ly, but since it's not currently available I suggest to implement that feature. Thank you.

we gotta make it legal lord