Login Register






Staff and Rep filter_list
Author
Message
Staff and Rep #1
My suggestion is that you should allow users to rep staff, or disallow staff from repping users.

The reason why I'm suggesting this is because the fact that staff can -5/-10 and/or +5/10 someone without said user being able to rep back is retarded. I'll elaborate more on this if there's any real opposing responses on the thread.

EDIT: apparently I need to state this since some people aren't getting the point... STAFF CANT BE REPPED YET THEY CAN REP OTHERS


RE: Staff and Rep #2
or it's gonna end up like most other forums where a group of people who hate a certain staff member get together and try to repfuck them


RE: Staff and Rep #3
(05-05-2016, 04:45 AM)sleaze Wrote: or it's gonna end up like most other forums where a group of people who hate a certain staff member get together and try to repfuck them

Or the other way around. This is why I suggested taking away staffs' right to rep all together so that neither can rep each other pos/neg.


RE: Staff and Rep #4
I don't think staff can get rep, I haven't gotten rep in a long time, negative or positive. It also doesn't display my rep either.


RE: Staff and Rep #5
(05-05-2016, 05:11 AM)Ayumi Wrote: Find a valid reason to rep someone, or realize rep doesn't really even matter.

Another point, just because I'm staff doesn't mean I shouldn't have an opinion or have the same priveledges as a normal member.

If this is your logic then you apparently have no sense of reason. What I was getting at by posting this thread is that it seems a little unfair that staff can rep users and users can't do the same, whether it's revenge rep or not. What if I have a valid reason to + or neg a staff? Seems pretty shitty that we can't do so, yet staff can do so to normal users. Also, I'm sure that if you actually thought rep didn't matter, you wouldn't have replied to this and wouldn't have repped the users that you previously have.

Moreover, you dug your own grave with your second point. Obviously anyone is allowed to have an opinion, the problem is that it seems that only the staffs' opinion is important, considering they're the only ones allowed to rep and not be repped. Just because I'm a normal user doesn't mean I shouldn't have an opinion or have the same repping "priveledges" (nice spelling bud) as a staff member. Again, this brings me to my original point that this is obviously unfair.

(05-05-2016, 05:40 AM)Skullmeat Wrote: I don't think staff can get rep, I haven't gotten rep in a long time, negative or positive. It also doesn't display my rep either.

Did you read the fucking thread at all?
(This post was last modified: 05-05-2016, 05:44 AM by meow.)


RE: Staff and Rep #6
I misunderstood. But there's a good reason we cant have rep. Its because people have a problem with authority. If we allowed it all the staff would have terrible rep, and that wouldnt look good.


RE: Staff and Rep #7
(05-05-2016, 05:46 AM)Skullmeat Wrote: I misunderstood. But there's a good reason we cant have rep. Its because people have a problem with authority. If we allowed it all the staff would have terrible rep, and that wouldnt look good.

It shouldn't be hard to delete faulty reputation considering you're a staff member.


RE: Staff and Rep #8
(05-05-2016, 05:45 AM)Migo Wrote: Actually, you're retarded, and nobody gives a fuck about this thread. Clearly.

You probably wouldn't be posting on it if you didn't care about it buddy.

This is the third thread of mine you've posted on, are you upset or are you just trying to get my attention? I'll go for both.

(05-05-2016, 05:52 AM)Ayumi Wrote: Wow, insulting my spelling, that's a great way to get your point across. It's hard to have a discussion with you if you're going to get butthurt when someone has a conflicting argument. Again, some users have issues with authority, and when a user breaks a rule and gets warned for it, will probably go neg that staff. (The users that have issues with authority.)

Quote:Wow, insulting my spelling, that's a great way to get your point across. It's hard to have a discussion with you if you're going to get butthurt when someone has a conflicting argument.

I won't respond to low-quality projection.

Quote:Again, some users have issues with authority, and when a user breaks a rule and gets warned for it, will probably go neg that staff.

At this point you're parroting Skullmeat because you can't formulate your own argument. Once again, it shouldn't be hard for a staff to delete faulty reputation.
(This post was last modified: 05-05-2016, 05:54 AM by meow.)


RE: Staff and Rep #9
(05-05-2016, 05:57 AM)Ayumi Wrote: Once again, buzzwording to seem intelligent. I'm not going to judge you, but Google the words you use before you use them.

Are you going to actually respond to the point I made or continue to insult my vocabulary? I don't have anything against you, this is supposed to be a logical discussion.


RE: Staff and Rep #10
(05-05-2016, 06:00 AM)Ayumi Wrote: Sure, we can go back to the discussion. I'm not restating @Skullmeat's argument because I can't formulate my own, it's because I agree with it. I don't have anything else to contribute to this discussion.

Alright. On an off-hand note, if revenge rep is not allowed, I'd like this rep removed - http://prntscr.com/b0fqbr @Migo is making me very upset !!1