Login Register




The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.


New balance filter_list
Author
Message
RE: New balance #41
(11-14-2022, 09:47 PM)mcpvperz Wrote:
(11-14-2022, 09:33 PM)djduderizx Wrote:
(11-14-2022, 03:21 PM)mothered Wrote: They're missing the point.

The purpose of a re-escalation, Is to have the claim re-assessed by a senior team member who was not Involved In the previous decision to decline It.
I kept telling them that

You'll just have to keep hammering it, they'll eventually get tired of you and give in.
Will try lad

Reply

RE: New balance #42
(11-14-2022, 09:33 PM)djduderizx Wrote:
(11-14-2022, 03:21 PM)mothered Wrote:
(11-14-2022, 03:18 PM)djduderizx Wrote: They will not reescelate since they've based it off weight?
They're missing the point.

The purpose of a re-escalation, Is to have the claim re-assessed by a senior team member who was not Involved In the previous decision to decline It.
I kept telling them that
Keep repeating It and If need be, shoot off the same email to every department you can think of, regardless of relevance.
[Image: AD83g1A.png]

[+] 1 user Likes mothered's post
Reply

RE: New balance #43
(11-15-2022, 01:52 AM)mothered Wrote:
(11-14-2022, 09:33 PM)djduderizx Wrote:
(11-14-2022, 03:21 PM)mothered Wrote: They're missing the point.

The purpose of a re-escalation, Is to have the claim re-assessed by a senior team member who was not Involved In the previous decision to decline It.
I kept telling them that
Keep repeating It and If need be, shoot off the same email to every department you can think of, regardless of relevance.
tried re escelating case yet again and they just say the evidence is there case is closed.
Give up at this point

Reply

RE: New balance #44
(11-19-2022, 01:03 PM)djduderizx Wrote:
(11-15-2022, 01:52 AM)mothered Wrote:
(11-14-2022, 09:33 PM)djduderizx Wrote: I kept telling them that
Keep repeating It and If need be, shoot off the same email to every department you can think of, regardless of relevance.
tried re escelating case yet again and they just say the evidence is there case is closed.
Give up at this point
Is a chargeback an option for you?
[Image: AD83g1A.png]

Reply

RE: New balance #45
(11-19-2022, 03:03 PM)mothered Wrote:
(11-19-2022, 01:03 PM)djduderizx Wrote:
(11-15-2022, 01:52 AM)mothered Wrote: Keep repeating It and If need be, shoot off the same email to every department you can think of, regardless of relevance.
tried re escelating case yet again and they just say the evidence is there case is closed.
Give up at this point
Is a chargeback an option for you?
Yes but not worth it since its only under 120

Reply

RE: New balance #46
(11-19-2022, 11:15 PM)djduderizx Wrote:
(11-19-2022, 03:03 PM)mothered Wrote:
(11-19-2022, 01:03 PM)djduderizx Wrote: tried re escelating case yet again and they just say the evidence is there case is closed.
Give up at this point
Is a chargeback an option for you?
Yes but not worth it since its only under 120
Understood.

(11-19-2022, 11:15 PM)djduderizx Wrote: tried re escelating case yet again and they just say the evidence is there
^ Did they provide solid evidence that fully supports their decision?
[Image: AD83g1A.png]

Reply

RE: New balance #47
(11-20-2022, 01:52 AM)mothered Wrote:
(11-19-2022, 11:15 PM)djduderizx Wrote:
(11-19-2022, 03:03 PM)mothered Wrote: Is a chargeback an option for you?
Yes but not worth it since its only under 120
Understood.

(11-19-2022, 11:15 PM)djduderizx Wrote: tried re escelating case yet again and they just say the evidence is there
^ Did they provide solid evidence that fully supports their decision?
Yes they just said the carriers weight made sure they had the shoes in the box

Reply

RE: New balance #48
(11-20-2022, 04:46 PM)djduderizx Wrote:
(11-20-2022, 01:52 AM)mothered Wrote:
(11-19-2022, 11:15 PM)djduderizx Wrote: Yes but not worth it since its only under 120
Understood.

(11-19-2022, 11:15 PM)djduderizx Wrote: tried re escelating case yet again and they just say the evidence is there
^ Did they provide solid evidence that fully supports their decision?
Yes they just said the carriers weight made sure they had the shoes in the box
What was the exact weight of the shoes?
[Image: AD83g1A.png]

Reply

RE: New balance #49
(11-21-2022, 03:05 AM)mothered Wrote:
(11-20-2022, 04:46 PM)djduderizx Wrote:
(11-20-2022, 01:52 AM)mothered Wrote: Understood.

^ Did they provide solid evidence that fully supports their decision?
Yes they just said the carriers weight made sure they had the shoes in the box
What was the exact weight of the shoes?
0.4 i believe

Reply

RE: New balance #50
(11-21-2022, 03:46 PM)djduderizx Wrote:
(11-21-2022, 03:05 AM)mothered Wrote:
(11-20-2022, 04:46 PM)djduderizx Wrote: Yes they just said the carriers weight made sure they had the shoes in the box
What was the exact weight of the shoes?
0.4 i believe
Is that 400 grams?
[Image: AD83g1A.png]

Reply