[Magnetron]

I would rather say its matter of opinion Smile

That NLP lacks scientific discipline or testing to provide any evidence for its claims is a fact, not an opinion.

You can heal depression and illnesses of similar nature verbally.

You should be careful how you craft your claims. Are you positive that NLP will heal all depression patient's verbally? I can guarantee you that some will commit suicide anyway, regardless of the therapy.

[A.W.H]

This was really interesting to read. I want to read more into this. Thanks for sharing.

[SPG.WoLF_TSC]

Wow, nice tutorial. May use this at some point ;D

[Linuxephus™]

"Science" refers to the body of reliable knowledge itself, of the type that can be logically and rationally explained. Since classical antiquity science as a type of knowledge was closely linked to philosophy. In the early modern era the words "science" and "philosophy" were sometimes used interchangeably in the English language. By the 17th century, natural philosophy (which is today called "natural science") was considered a separate branch of philosophy. However, "science" continued to be used in a broad sense denoting reliable knowledge about a topic, in the same way it is still used in modern terms such as library science or political science.
"In modern use, "science" more often refers to a way of pursuing knowledge, not only the knowledge itself. It is "often treated as synonymous with 'natural and physical science', and thus restricted to those branches of study that relate to the phenomena of the material universe and their laws, sometimes with implied exclusion of pure mathematics. This is now the dominant sense in ordinary use."

In actuality, both of you whom were debating the definition of science were correct in it's current usage. So states the source from which the above was quoted by [a] qualified person[s] on the subject.

Footnote: This was quoted in part directly from Wikipedia.
I did not see fit to change the wording nor the context of that wording due to it's inherent correctness in both grammar and context of the subject material being conveyed to the reader at the time of writing.

[Nigtelf]

Hey man I read this and it's actually quite nice! I like your post short and understandable xD But GJ! Going to read some more now Have a nice day ^^

[quantumchaology]

NLP is bullshit, any scientist or anyone educated in the definition of science will tell you NLP, as well as all of psychology is a pseudoscience. If you wanna "reprogram" someones brain, buy some slick wetware if that even exists yet, lol.

psychology is only a soft science as its a study of behavior and cannot be proved to be 100% true all we can say in this field is that it is probably true but don't let that make you think its not important or usefull (that would be ignorant). I agree NLP is a pseudo-science and it is nothing more than, if anything, hypnotism. the sub-conscience mind of an individual is always watching and taking in info and filtering it to decide what you conscientiously perseive as true. All nlp does IF ANYTHING is alter what info the sub-conscience decides is important. WICH IS HYPNOTISM!!!! you really want to manipulate, "hack", and control the human mind learn and master hypnotism. hypnotism is a relatively new field of scientific research and as a science, though soft, is still in its infancy, ready to have its REAL mysteries unlocked.
see the potential power of this SOFT/ PSEUDO-SCIENCE can have in the link below.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzpMK5oYioM

[UnKnowN112]

Do you know any place where i could learn NLP? for free ofc.
cant seem to find any good pages on google to Learn it.

[UnKnowN112]

Do you know any place where i could learn NLP? for free ofc.
cant seem to find any good pages on google to Learn it.

[UnKnowN112]

Do you know any place where i could learn NLP? for free ofc.
cant seem to find any good pages on google to Learn it.