[anonim6]

first of all the tittle is kinda of a clickbait because i just aplied this method once but i have another order coming to my local shop, im gonna update the thread in the next weeks with more orders, i really cant see the point of failure with this method.

*******Refunds******
NIKE - 390€ - 15/12

1- create an account, wait for about 2 weeks and make your purchase, i suggest a limit of 500€ just for safety, use a VCC from like Revolut choose a drop-off location like some shop in your town, in my country nike works with UPS distribution and many of shop are available, i prefer to use this kinda of delevery to avoid have someone knocking at my door someday and is better if you want to do this method more than once.
2- wait for the package to arrive at the shop and go collect it.
3 - DONT OPEN YOUR PACKAGE, simply grab it first and put on the balance and regist the weight of the package, this will make sense latter.
4- open your package and grab your items
5- wait 1/2 days and than make a return for all the items, you will receive a label in your mal.
6- put some old school books inside the package to the weight of the package correspond to the original one.
7- print the label with a desapearing ink with your printer and than run for the postage office at a friday end of the afternoon before the post office closes.
8 - wait 7 days and contact them just to ckeck-up they will investigate and after 14 days they will refund you since the package was lost and they cant trace it.

Im open to clarify any question in comments, im doing this method in EU.

[Elsdebo]

Mothered advised to not use dIssapearing ink iirc, because it is a roll of the dice. The ink can be made visible again, and then you are royaly fucked because it shows intent to fraud. Its too big of a irregularity to be ignored for a delivery service repeatedly. It draws attention because packages don't lose their labels. Mailfraud is no joke in some countries. With FTID you can at least plead some ignorance and the delivery service will likely not be bothered as much.

I dont want to cast shade on your accomplishments tho. Congrats

[anonim6]

Mothered advised to not use dIssapearing ink iirc, because it is a roll of the dice. The ink can be made visible again, and then you are royaly fucked because it shows intent to fraud. Its too big of a irregularity to be ignored for a delivery service repeatedly. It draws attention because packages don't lose their labels. Mailfraud is no joke in some countries. With FTID you can at least plead some ignorance and the delivery service will likely not be bothered as much.

I dont want to cast shade on your accomplishments tho. Congrats

I can understand your point but do you think it is possible to recover the ink? i have study what the ink does and dont think is possible to recover it at least the ink that i use.
Do you think i probably will get in trouble if i procced to other refunds with the same method?

[Elsdebo]

I just repeated what Mothered said sometime ago. The thread was about dark purple dissapearing ink, which can be made visible again with chemicals. Are you using this one?
If you do it repeatedly on the same service point yes you will get in trouble. I can imagine someone working there asking themselves: This is already the second package without a label this month and last month there were 3?!

If you cannot imagine these risks then I think you should not use dissapearing ink often at all.

[anonim6]

I just repeated what Mothered said sometime ago. The thread was about dark purple dissapearing ink, which can be made visible again with chemicals.  Are you using this one? 
If you do it repeatedly on the same service point yes you will get in trouble. I can imagine someone working there asking themselves: This is already the second package without a label this month and last month there were 3?!

If you cannot imagine these risks then I think you should not use dissapearing ink often at all.

i think we are talking about the same ink ye, i live in a small city so i dont think that someone is using this method too, i just used it once, so i think i will keep doing some refunds with different courries, to avoid suspicious, i think if i didnt use it too much i wiil not have problems.

[speedtail001]

I just repeated what Mothered said sometime ago. The thread was about dark purple dissapearing ink, which can be made visible again with chemicals.  Are you using this one? 
If you do it repeatedly on the same service point yes you will get in trouble. I can imagine someone working there asking themselves: This is already the second package without a label this month and last month there were 3?!

If you cannot imagine these risks then I think you should not use dissapearing ink often at all.

i think we are talking about the same ink ye, i live in a small city so i dont think that someone is using this method too, i just used it once, so i think i will keep doing some refunds with different courries, to avoid suspicious, i think if i didnt use it too much i wiil not have problems.

send me a link for the ink

[anonim6]

I just repeated what Mothered said sometime ago. The thread was about dark purple dissapearing ink, which can be made visible again with chemicals.  Are you using this one? 
If you do it repeatedly on the same service point yes you will get in trouble. I can imagine someone working there asking themselves: This is already the second package without a label this month and last month there were 3?!

If you cannot imagine these risks then I think you should not use dissapearing ink often at all.

Came up one idea in my mind just right now, you can do something like ftidv3/v5 the label and than print the label with the ink, with this even if they recover the ink they cant reach you because your informations are not on the label, i think is really hard for some kinda of investigation if you use both methods together at the same time

[speedtail001]

I just repeated what Mothered said sometime ago. The thread was about dark purple dissapearing ink, which can be made visible again with chemicals.  Are you using this one? 
If you do it repeatedly on the same service point yes you will get in trouble. I can imagine someone working there asking themselves: This is already the second package without a label this month and last month there were 3?!

If you cannot imagine these risks then I think you should not use dissapearing ink often at all.

Came up one idea in my mind just right now, you can do something like ftidv3/v5 the label and than print the label with the ink, with this even if they recover the ink they cant reach you because your informations are not on the label, i think is really hard for some kinda of investigation if you use both methods together at the same time

please can i have link for ink

[Elsdebo]

I just repeated what Mothered said sometime ago. The thread was about dark purple dissapearing ink, which can be made visible again with chemicals.  Are you using this one? 
If you do it repeatedly on the same service point yes you will get in trouble. I can imagine someone working there asking themselves: This is already the second package without a label this month and last month there were 3?!

If you cannot imagine these risks then I think you should not use dissapearing ink often at all.

Came up one idea in my mind just right now, you can do something like ftidv3/v5 the label and than print the label with the ink, with this even if they recover the ink they cant reach you because your informations are not on the label, i think is really hard for some kinda of investigation if you use both methods together at the same time

The tracking code or tracking label provided to you by the company you are SEing is tied to your (drop) house and refund case. If you have a fake ID on those then you are safer yes.
I am glad you are thinking it over more now. Good luck.