[paddington]

I believe that there is a theory for everything, quite like a basic mathematic principle! We have found that everything within this universe is pretty much relative! Basic bits and bobs come together to create a complex network of bits and bobs.

The question being, where this is one principle come from and who created it? How are we to know, and no one is truly right in this case, because we as humans will not understand something that could be so simple.

However, there is evidence of evolution! One cannot deny this, because all species adapt to their environments! We have to remember that the world was a different place millions of years ago when mammals began to rule the planet. So many different breeds that have been shifted throughout different geographies either through natural disasters/events, or migration for resources.

Look at dogs for example, and how they have evolved from when they were wilder beasts. What environmental conditions caused these canine species to become affable to man, to then become a servant of man? Their original genetic structure has changed through environmental changes, genetic mutations through cross breeding, and their adaptability to the work they were bred for.

Everything on this planet has come from a single celled organism which then exploded into different organisms which then changed, and so forth.

There is no quantifiable proof that a creator exists, yet when we find features of the fibonacci sequence, or the golden ratio, one must think that there must be some formula for the design of life on this planet, and beyond!

[Gideon]

Paddington, I find two fallacies in your evidence for evolution.

First of all, you're assuming the Earth is millions of years old.
and secondly, you're assuming that because micro-evolution is true, therefore macro evolution is true.

Also, basically everything you've laid out is theory and premise, not fact.

I know I'm not supporting a very popular idea... and I'm sorry if I sound at all argumentative. My intent is to point out the errors behind the evolutionary theory, and not to knock down people merely because they differ from my belief.

[Flashdrive]

Why was my post removed from here?

[Lord Karnage]

Evolution has been proven so yes I do. Animal and plant breeders are a fine example of evolution.

[Gideon]

Lord Karnage. I agree to a point. Animal and plant breeders are a fine example of micro evolution.
Have they managed to breed a fish into a lizard? Or how'bout a horse into an elephant?

There is a distinct differentiation between micro and macro evolution.
Micro is merely a change within the species, contained in the genetic code.
Macro is one species changing into another, and requires information to be added to the genetic code.

[Lord Karnage]

Lord Karnage. I agree to a point. Animal and plant breeders are a fine example of micro evolution.
Have they managed to breed a fish into a lizard? Or how'bout a horse into an elephant?

There is a distinct differentiation between micro and macro evolution.
Micro is merely a change within the species, contained in the genetic code.
Macro is one species changing into another, and requires information to be added to the genetic code.

That is completely different though. You can't breed two different species. You're also taking what I'm saying out of context. Read this as it explains macro evolution better than me.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macroevolution

[Squilly]

Catholicism (or the Church) has nothing to back up history. Evolution does. Yes, I strongly believe in evolution.

[Azazel]

While it's impossible to deny evolution as a whole, it's very possible to deny evolution as far back as a single-celled organism. That's why people do deny evolution.

I, however, do believe that evolution is correct and accurate.

[Operate]

This thread has been moved to the proper forum.
(General-->Intelectual Outlet)