Login Register




The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.


GPU SE with sealed box method filter_list
Author
Message
RE: GPU SE with sealed box method #21
Return the item and get a refund. Then next time do better research on the item you are planning to SE

Reply

RE: GPU SE with sealed box method #22
(03-26-2022, 05:52 PM)eljot88 Wrote: Yes, it was like original one. It wasn’t even cardboard but carton letter, so I used a knife to remove glue from one side, I opened and use a hot glue to close it. It looked better then before, because corners were a bit damaged by dhl.
There would have been a slight Inconsistency with the packaging, that triggered the need to check Its contents.

(03-26-2022, 05:52 PM)eljot88 Wrote: Shall I go with another same SE or should I buy something, don’t sending back and wait a while? Can you advise?
Please elaborate precisely what you have In mind.
[Image: AD83g1A.png]

Reply

RE: GPU SE with sealed box method #23
(03-27-2022, 12:38 AM)mothered Wrote:
(03-26-2022, 05:52 PM)eljot88 Wrote: Yes, it was like original one. It wasn’t even cardboard but carton letter, so I used a knife to remove glue from one side, I opened and use a hot glue to close it. It looked better then before, because corners were a bit damaged by dhl.
There would have been a slight Inconsistency with the packaging, that triggered the need to check Its contents.

(03-26-2022, 05:52 PM)eljot88 Wrote: Shall I go with another same SE or should I buy something, don’t sending back and wait a while? Can you advise?
Please elaborate precisely what you have In mind.
I have failed so I suspect that I could received a red flag on my account. Can I continue with another sealed box method? This time I will prepare with stickers, original box and dummy phone. Should work. How do you think?

Reply

RE: GPU SE with sealed box method #24
(03-27-2022, 01:46 AM)eljot88 Wrote: I have failed so I suspect that I could received a red flag on my account. Can I continue with another sealed box method? This time I will prepare with stickers, original box and dummy phone. Should work. How do you think?
It's not good practice to use the same method In succession.

Nonetheless, to draw attention away from the SE, It's best to make at least one legit purchase and wait a few weeks prior to using the sealed box method again.
[Image: AD83g1A.png]

Reply

RE: GPU SE with sealed box method #25
so @eljot88 have you tried sealed box again with better preparation?

Reply

RE: GPU SE with sealed box method #26
(05-24-2022, 09:59 AM)HEIS Wrote: so @eljot88 have you tried sealed box again with better preparation?

Nope. In my opinion that method is dead, especially with apple products. I have focused on EB method and i work with one refunder.

Reply

RE: GPU SE with sealed box method #27
(05-25-2022, 09:36 AM)eljot88 Wrote:
(05-24-2022, 09:59 AM)HEIS Wrote: so @eljot88 have you tried sealed box again with better preparation?

Nope. In my opinion that method is dead, especially with apple products. I have focused  on EB method  and i work with one refunder.

@mothered If I'm not mistaken, I believe @eljot88 is trying to say he resealed the SHIPPING packaging, not the Item packaging. Correct me if I am wrong ofcourse. But if that is the case, ofcourse it wouldn't work. The whole point of the sealed box method to give them back an exactly the same product, in it's sealed BOX, to put back on the shelf. All you did (If ive understood) is just resealed the envelope it came in.
Doh haha

Edit: sorry the original comments are from 2 months ago, the latest replies drew my attention to the full thread
(This post was last modified: 05-25-2022, 10:34 PM by _Kenzo_. Edit Reason: edit )

Reply

RE: GPU SE with sealed box method #28
(05-25-2022, 10:33 PM)_Kenzo_ Wrote: The whole point of the sealed box method to give them back an exactly the same product, in it's sealed BOX, to put back on the shelf.
Precisely.

That's exactly my point with the sealed box method.
[Image: AD83g1A.png]

Reply