[Theós]

Any hint?

Almost sure it's going to be about design or anime; mainly because their personalities.

Grats, you gonna say how much it costed or you prefer not to.

And like Oxyrus said, i'm like 70% sure it will be Graphics or Anime. Either way it will be HQ

lol it's 25% design, no anime what so ever.

What's the other 75% then :p imma guess technology side stuff like coding n stuff.

I'm so excited I'll just spill the beans. I'll update the thread in a sec.

[Jebusfathead]

Any hint?

Almost sure it's going to be about design or anime; mainly because their personalities.

Grats, you gonna say how much it costed or you prefer not to.

And like Oxyrus said, i'm like 70% sure it will be Graphics or Anime. Either way it will be HQ

lol it's 25% design, no anime what so ever.

What's the other 75% then :p imma guess technology side stuff like coding n stuff.

I'm so excited I'll just spill the beans. I'll update the thread in a sec.

Ohhh looks nice. Visual designs is cool obviouslyyy. Literature has always been a hit or miss with me, but I still enjoy it. Photography and music are ok for me, I don't do much with either. But science and philosophy, now that's my sort of thing. Looks like it will be a pretty good group.

[Redsin]

Usergroup's leadership users may not be the most fitting - considering the posts I have seen. Consider only keeping one of the two named as a leader and run it solo.

[Almighty]

Usergroup's leadership users may not be the most fitting - considering the posts I have seen. Consider only keeping one of the two named as a leader and run it solo.

First off what is this "Usergroup's leadership users" I think you meant to say the current leaders of the group and since both of them are buying the group, I'm sure both of them would want to be leader. I believe both users will make wonderful leaders and from past experiences I know they can make a great group. Both users have what it takes and won't let the group die and even if they do it's their choice as they bought it.

[yokai]

Usergroup's leadership users may not be the most fitting - considering the posts I have seen. Consider only keeping one of the two named as a leader and run it solo.

Based on what? Our ability to cooperate? Learn from each other and mostly understand one and the other without having to explain ourselves to each other? I thought that made us good partners.

[Theós]

Usergroup's leadership users may not be the most fitting - considering the posts I have seen. Consider only keeping one of the two named as a leader and run it solo.

First off what is this "Usergroup's leadership users" I think you meant to say the current leaders of the group and since both of them are buying the group, I'm sure both of them would want to be leader. I believe both users will make wonderful leaders and from past experiences I know they can make a great group. Both users have what it takes and won't let the group die and even if they do it's their choice as they bought it.

I actually I bought it myself I made @12 my partner because he is very qualified to be a leader.

[Jebusfathead]

Usergroup's leadership users may not be the most fitting - considering the posts I have seen. Consider only keeping one of the two named as a leader and run it solo.

First off what is this "Usergroup's leadership users" I think you meant to say the current leaders of the group and since both of them are buying the group, I'm sure both of them would want to be leader. I believe both users will make wonderful leaders and from past experiences I know they can make a great group. Both users have what it takes and won't let the group die and even if they do it's their choice as they bought it.

He's basically saying that because of the stuff in a thread where it looks like there is some like real disrespect between the 2 owners he doesn't think that their partnership is good. But their 'disrespect' is like banter or something idk

[Redsin]

I said it because I thought they were not 'friendly' anymore. I assume I am in the wrong here.

[yokai]

He's basically saying that because of the stuff in a thread where it looks like there is some like real disrespect between the 2 owners he doesn't think that their partnership is good. But their 'disrespect' is like banter or something idk

I'd say that its more that we are honest, and neither is being salty or childish over it. Also, is that my old template? (Signature) ow0

[Almighty]

Usergroup's leadership users may not be the most fitting - considering the posts I have seen. Consider only keeping one of the two named as a leader and run it solo.

First off what is this "Usergroup's leadership users" I think you meant to say the current leaders of the group and since both of them are buying the group, I'm sure both of them would want to be leader. I believe both users will make wonderful leaders and from past experiences I know they can make a great group. Both users have what it takes and won't let the group die and even if they do it's their choice as they bought it.

He's basically saying that because of the stuff in a thread where it looks like there is some like real disrespect between the 2 owners he doesn't think that their partnership is good. But their 'disrespect' is like banter or something idk

I would say they have a mutual respect, they pick each others' work and give harsh critique.