[Green314]

What do you mean by that?

He means exactly what you mentioned.
Don't remove anything, instead just spoof i.e alter and change numbers and names, etc.

If they compare the Tracking-id captured by the qr with the one written on the label (sometimes happens) I would be screwed.

Sorry guys, I made a mistake, I wanted to say:

If the owners of the UPS Access Point during the collection of the FTID compare the Tracking-id captured by the qr with the one written on the label (sometimes happens) I would be screwed.

You know the procedure of send a UPS package in a UPS point, right? Sometimes the owner of the shop (if they're not in hurry) may check the Tracking-id with the one written on the label. This would definitely reveal my intention and fail the attempt of SEing them.
And removing is a thing, falsify it is another. Remove means that may be unintentional ("I received the label as they sent me it"), falsify is definitely intentional. (It cannot be truly justified).

[Roadman]

He means exactly what you mentioned.
Don't remove anything, instead just spoof i.e alter and change numbers and names, etc.

If they compare the Tracking-id captured by the qr with the one written on the label (sometimes happens) I would be screwed.

Sorry guys, I made a mistake, I wanted to say:

If the owners of the UPS Access Point during the collection of the FTID compare the Tracking-id captured by the qr with the one written on the label (sometimes happens) I would be screwed.

You know the procedure of send a UPS package in a UPS point, right? Sometimes the owner of the shop (if they're not in hurry) may check the Tracking-id with the one written on the label. This would definitely reveal my intention and fail the attempt of SEing them.
And removing is a thing, falsify it is another. Remove means that may be unintentional ("I received the label as they sent me it"), falsify is definitely intentional. (It cannot be truly justified).

UPS access point owners don't care. Spoofing or deleting the tracking completely, you can say that's the way it was given to you to print.

[mothered]

UPS access point owners don't care. Spoofing or deleting the tracking completely, you can say that's the way it was given to you to print.

If completely removing/manipulating the tracking and given carriers operate on a scanning system, how will your package be marked as delivered from consignor to consignee?

[Roadman]

UPS access point owners don't care. Spoofing or deleting the tracking completely, you can say that's the way it was given to you to print.

If completely removing/manipulating the tracking and given carriers operate on a scanning system, how will your package be marked as delivered from consignor to consignee?

that's a good question, and is exactly why ftid is only 50-50.

[mothered]

UPS access point owners don't care. Spoofing or deleting the tracking completely, you can say that's the way it was given to you to print.

If completely removing/manipulating the tracking and given carriers operate on a scanning system, how will your package be marked as delivered from consignor to consignee?

that's a good question, and is exactly why ftid is only 50-50.

I certainly agree.

In fact, I'd rate the flawed FTID less than 20% chance of success. At my work, It's zero- guaranteed to fail each and every time.