[NoodlePoodle]

Would a tracking and signed for delivery method make the DNA harder to pull off? If so, how would one make it work, or do you just be adament that it DNA?

[Jared]

They have no proof that it was actually you who signed for the package. It could have been anyone, therefore DNA would still work if the package was signed for. If the package was signed for with your signature and they can prove it is your signature, then it may not work. GL

[Defeat]

They have no proof that it was actually you who signed for the package. It could have been anyone, therefore DNA would still work if the package was signed for. If the package was signed for with your signature and they can prove it is your signature, then it may not work. GL

It might depend on the company involved. I find that it it's PayPal that's the payment platform, all they really care about is the signature confirmation as proof of delivery if a case arises. With most company's direct payment methods, you can get more leeway I feel because you're just dealing with them directly.

[NoodlePoodle]

They have no proof that it was actually you who signed for the package. It could have been anyone, therefore DNA would still work if the package was signed for. If the package was signed for with your signature and they can prove it is your signature, then it may not work. GL

It might depend on the company involved.  I find that it it's PayPal that's the payment platform, all they really care about is the signature confirmation as proof of delivery if a case arises.  With most company's direct payment methods, you can get more leeway I feel because you're just dealing with them directly.

Ah I see. My dilemma is that I ordered a bunch of nintendo switch stuff worth £500 from eglobal. I chose standard delivery instead of insurance covered delivery. I am unsure whether I should go for the DNA or wrong item. I would be very grateful for a recommendation. Thank you