RE: DNA? 05-20-2022, 05:15 PM
#5
(05-20-2022, 04:30 PM)Wimzaa Wrote: The original SE was a warranty claim where I instructed the company I had destroyed goods as it posed a hazard. Company sent a replacement item and onward all details the same as OP.Understood.
So there's been no lost item but a destroyed one that was replaced and now I wonder whether or not I should sontinue with DNA for two bites of the same apple.
Under the circumstances, the DNA Is Ideal.














![[+]](https://sinister.li/images/modern/collapse_collapsed.png)