Arch VS Kali 10-17-2013, 01:38 PM
#1
Greetings,
I was looking for a set of operating systems that I could efficiently use for pentesting/hacking.
Upon looking up on the internet , I found kinda an expected response , Backtrack/Kali DIstro.
I went to its homepage and studied it a bit and it looked appealing , just as was expected from it.
However , many of the users also said that I should use Arch Linux for it , as usual I went to its website and found out that
its a decent distro which is highly customizable , I saw its packages and all and they were the same tools which were pre-installed in Kali.
The point here is , that almost all available linux distros are able to be customized to that degree,
and if that is the case , why does Arch Linux Stands out?
And if you can customize all distros and make them hacking OS'es ,
What was the need of releasing OS'es like Kali/Backtrack?
-Thanks!
I was looking for a set of operating systems that I could efficiently use for pentesting/hacking.
Upon looking up on the internet , I found kinda an expected response , Backtrack/Kali DIstro.
I went to its homepage and studied it a bit and it looked appealing , just as was expected from it.
However , many of the users also said that I should use Arch Linux for it , as usual I went to its website and found out that
its a decent distro which is highly customizable , I saw its packages and all and they were the same tools which were pre-installed in Kali.
The point here is , that almost all available linux distros are able to be customized to that degree,
and if that is the case , why does Arch Linux Stands out?
And if you can customize all distros and make them hacking OS'es ,
What was the need of releasing OS'es like Kali/Backtrack?
-Thanks!


![[+]](https://sinister.li/images/modern/collapse_collapsed.png)


